Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Political Debate Board Message Board

I did not state that I didn't think the race was c

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 65629
Posted On: 09/16/2016 9:05:12 AM
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: cashclan #19902
I did not state that I didn't think the race was close but rather that the recent polls don't yet reflect a fundamental change in the electoral vote projections.

You talk about your 'slice of the pie' family and friends? Well of course, there was a story yesterday that practically no one knows people who are voting for the other party!

I remember in '12 the 'everybody I know polls' of a conservative acquaintance that, of course, had no one NOT voting for Romney.

How'd that work out?

You can run with that 'democratic cities' meme all you like, but the fact is that the major cities and surrounding areas are the drivers of wealth and jobs in this country, and in the world.

The Census Report the other day indicated that in fact a rising economic tide did in fact lift all boats in '15, including those of the poor with a corresponding decrease in the poverty rate.

As for 'hope'? That is also all that people have throughout large swaths of the South and the Great Plains.

Intractable, intergenerational poverty is not confined to the cities and cutting taxes and increasing spending, as Trump proposes, is not the answer, much less an engine for 3.5% GDP growth

The Clinton model of the 90's, raise taxes, cut spending, was at least responsible for a budget surplus, that was squandered by Dubya, with consequent results.

Trump wants to try the 'Dubya economic model', again.

No thanks, say everybody I know!







(1)
(0)








Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us