i only speak for myself .. i have no doubts that s
Post# of 43064
but i also am fully cognizant that *many* actual P2O investors have never
sold one share of PTOI .. not in 2009 .. not in 2010 .. not in 2011 .. not in
2012 .. not in 2013 .. not in 2014 .. not in 2015 and not now (btw .. i also
recognize that many also haven't DCA'd PTOI *shares* .. but others
absolutely have .. known volume picks via longs' over last 2 days = 240,000+)
which is why unlike so many other heavily targeted OTC stox .. CEs' have
such a dilemma with P2O's ability to execute
i realize hedgie trolls .. former employees fired by RH and interchangeable
multi alias *crews* .. *cant* have anything positive to *post* about P2O
this isn't news .. and there clearly is always *risk* with any US Equity
(hopefully it isn't news to anyone in it that it is a rigged market .,, HFT/algos)
but all patterns reveal themselves given enough time and that is the irony
with PTOI (stock)
with P2O's ability to do material events in parallel .. or just their first sale to a *known* entity ..
PTOI will have *record setting volume* that makes the CEs' *set up* of April
2011's *8M~* (from memory so i may be off .. take up in the $3 to $4 pps)
look *puny* .. i'm talking 20M to 30M in one day or a week ..
it won't surprise me if it's double that .. one thing about *exhaustion* by retail
is *many* (but not all) will sell out in total .. and when this *volume*
commences via the algos .. CEs' will go for every *set* GTC *visible* via l3
imo RH is both methodical and conservative .. so i have no doubts there is a *there* .. there .. what no one but the parties' involved know is if the time line
aligns to monies in place .. which imo buy P2O thru EO Jan 2017 (as of
$200,000 known raised) .. and i'm not sure that *some* actual P2O investors
(vs those who don't hold one share but create noise daily) won't sell @ EOY
if the only filing out of P2O thru EOY is the 8K filed on this week's update
and the Q filed in November
but because RH is methodical and conservative .. and because i'm inclined
to believe that the interested party of the founder's disruptive tech has
the passion and tenacity to *implement* .. my belief is that DA can come
at any time ..
PTOI (stock) never should have been *taken* by CEs to 018 .. and it never should
have been RUN by CEs' to over $7 ..
that is the ironic aspect about heavily targeted stox regardless of where traded
once the hole is dug so deep .. the cycle has to continue .. usually CEs' win
they haven't yet with P2O/PTOI
and that not only galls and provokes angst .. it will be totally obvious to even
*multis* .. with P2O's ability to execute
4kids