if Cellceutix investors really want to understand what is going on re: CTIX (stock)
.. it requires documentation
i wish i could offer to commit the time it takes .. but currently i am unable to do
so for Cellceutix Investors (of which i am one) .. beyond the cursory bits i've posted here
first thing to be done is to copy out every trade done daily
when i can .. i do it on the NSS board on ihub and then port over here
this site .. is beyond helpful .. because one can pull up time stamps daily
from Pre Market t trades .. to t trades After hours and every *trade* done
daily ..
http://quotes.freerealtime.com/dl/frt/M?IM=qu...ymbol=ctix
imo *most* (not all) 100 *trades* are algos .. algos' (to me) scream manipulation
second .. if comfortable and always after the fact (never b4) .. post actual
time stamps (time stamps usually available via broker's form or broker)
.. so that those who've either hit the ask or sat bid (providing speed bumps
against the CEs' efforts) can see how known legit trade was handled
this matters .. because as i pointed out last week when i had 2 bids filled
you can show *how the fill was handled* .. one was bundled into (meaning
there is an offset) .. the other was duplicated in total .. with the mirrored trade
done at the higher PPS .. which imo most likely was *marked* for that day's
daily reg sho
third .. every Monday (or if a holiday .. on Tuesday) .. check ATS Dark Pool
to see what *ARCA* did for the week .. remember this data is *reported*
4 weeks in arrears .. this is why i try to keep a daily log for every investment
i'm in .. so if i see ARCA on the ask .. on CTIX .. i know it's almost always
a *decoy* utilized re: ATS Dark Pool .. and recently (last 2 months) .. *showing*
more than *reporting ..
https://otctransparency.finra.org/
fourth .. every month check what a MM or ECN *factually* reports to FINRA
re: MM Monthly *volume* .. this too matters .. because what becomes crystal
clear are the patterns in play re: wash trading ..
http://otce.finra.org/MonthlyShareVolume
so for example .. one might see the PRIMARY *rotates* with the SECONDARY
every other month .. (passing paper or as i call it rolling resets) but if one
breaks out their calculator .. one might see .. that the % done for the month
by the PRIMARY equals the next 3 MMs' totals .. CEs' are rather sloppy
with this data (obvious) .. until they are under the gun
then there is *volume* .. think of a balloon filled with helium .. when they *reset*
they fill the balloon until something has to give .. this is when *usually* ..
sans news .. one will observe *volume* done for the *raid* DOWN .. or volume
done for the take UP .. this too is rolling the reset .. i strongly (can't prove it)
suspect this behavior is % based
which is why i'm always so focused on what they *show* for volume avgs
(note what i call algo avgs when the 10 and 90 days are within 10% of
each other)
lastly .. the other key to realize is they are coming up against their own *manipulations* ..
i.e. the resets that come to pass on the 52 week high and low .. this *imo* always proves telling in how handled by CEs
remember these sobs *almost always* CON troll the outcome of every targeted
OTC stock .. because they can .. CEs' work various SMBs .. and count on
a retail who is clueless about what is done via the daily tape of *trades*
but also remember .. legit ( and aware ) mgmts can not only outlast .. but with their ability to
execute .. they force CEs' into a position .. that *shows* both volume
and a significant PPS increase .. CEs' last round of their cycle of money (approx
10c) was them letting out a little helium .. the *take* UP .. for the reset DOWN
it's all about their ability to CON troll outcomes and
outlast investors
that is why *imo* hitting the ask is almost always a fool's game that aids
and abets the CEs .. legit bids on the other hand .. may be jumped by another
CE (colluding entity) or bypassed altogether .. MMs' show what they want when
they want and they can *fill* another *entity* while bypassing a legit bid in total
one other aspect and why it helps to know what gets done daily ..
when non retail CEs' are up against the wall (little abusive liquidity available to them)
they will take a decent sized legit bid and literally make it the UC ask ..
that then another will *hit* to reset and then *fill* the (almost always) mirrored
trade of size
CEs = colluding entities
UC = undercut
NC = no change
note for today (this post) ~ CTIX
Open 1.33
Day High 1.33
Day Low 1.27
Previous Close
09/07/2016 1.33
52-Week High ** 1.00 range will begin decreasing
11/25/2015 1.955
52-Week Low
10/23/2015 0.9412
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
09/07/2016 -26.11%
Volume 53,403
Volume (10 day Average) 165 ,603 ** algo volume
Volume (90 day Average) 162 ,333 ** algo volume
ask yourself .. would you spend the time on a SMB if you had no financial interest .. (btw .. that interest can be both long or short or trading a %)
then ask yourself .. would the system be gamed (money garnered) by preying on retails' ignorance
now multiply those trades for one legit OTC company .. by 1000s ..
suspect it's been like taking candy from a baby ~ for damn near a decade +
4kids
.. it requires documentation
i wish i could offer to commit the time it takes .. but currently i am unable to do
so for Cellceutix Investors (of which i am one) .. beyond the cursory bits i've posted here
first thing to be done is to copy out every trade done daily
when i can .. i do it on the NSS board on ihub and then port over here
this site .. is beyond helpful .. because one can pull up time stamps daily
from Pre Market t trades .. to t trades After hours and every *trade* done
daily ..
http://quotes.freerealtime.com/dl/frt/M?IM=qu...ymbol=ctix
imo *most* (not all) 100 *trades* are algos .. algos' (to me) scream manipulation
second .. if comfortable and always after the fact (never b4) .. post actual
time stamps (time stamps usually available via broker's form or broker)
.. so that those who've either hit the ask or sat bid (providing speed bumps
against the CEs' efforts) can see how known legit trade was handled
this matters .. because as i pointed out last week when i had 2 bids filled
you can show *how the fill was handled* .. one was bundled into (meaning
there is an offset) .. the other was duplicated in total .. with the mirrored trade
done at the higher PPS .. which imo most likely was *marked* for that day's
daily reg sho
third .. every Monday (or if a holiday .. on Tuesday) .. check ATS Dark Pool
to see what *ARCA* did for the week .. remember this data is *reported*
4 weeks in arrears .. this is why i try to keep a daily log for every investment
i'm in .. so if i see ARCA on the ask .. on CTIX .. i know it's almost always
a *decoy* utilized re: ATS Dark Pool .. and recently (last 2 months) .. *showing*
more than *reporting ..
https://otctransparency.finra.org/
fourth .. every month check what a MM or ECN *factually* reports to FINRA
re: MM Monthly *volume* .. this too matters .. because what becomes crystal
clear are the patterns in play re: wash trading ..
http://otce.finra.org/MonthlyShareVolume
so for example .. one might see the PRIMARY *rotates* with the SECONDARY
every other month .. (passing paper or as i call it rolling resets) but if one
breaks out their calculator .. one might see .. that the % done for the month
by the PRIMARY equals the next 3 MMs' totals .. CEs' are rather sloppy
with this data (obvious) .. until they are under the gun
then there is *volume* .. think of a balloon filled with helium .. when they *reset*
they fill the balloon until something has to give .. this is when *usually* ..
sans news .. one will observe *volume* done for the *raid* DOWN .. or volume
done for the take UP .. this too is rolling the reset .. i strongly (can't prove it)
suspect this behavior is % based
which is why i'm always so focused on what they *show* for volume avgs
(note what i call algo avgs when the 10 and 90 days are within 10% of
each other)
lastly .. the other key to realize is they are coming up against their own *manipulations* ..
i.e. the resets that come to pass on the 52 week high and low .. this *imo* always proves telling in how handled by CEs
remember these sobs *almost always* CON troll the outcome of every targeted
OTC stock .. because they can .. CEs' work various SMBs .. and count on
a retail who is clueless about what is done via the daily tape of *trades*
but also remember .. legit ( and aware ) mgmts can not only outlast .. but with their ability to
execute .. they force CEs' into a position .. that *shows* both volume
and a significant PPS increase .. CEs' last round of their cycle of money (approx
10c) was them letting out a little helium .. the *take* UP .. for the reset DOWN
it's all about their ability to CON troll outcomes and
outlast investors
that is why *imo* hitting the ask is almost always a fool's game that aids
and abets the CEs .. legit bids on the other hand .. may be jumped by another
CE (colluding entity) or bypassed altogether .. MMs' show what they want when
they want and they can *fill* another *entity* while bypassing a legit bid in total
one other aspect and why it helps to know what gets done daily ..
when non retail CEs' are up against the wall (little abusive liquidity available to them)
they will take a decent sized legit bid and literally make it the UC ask ..
that then another will *hit* to reset and then *fill* the (almost always) mirrored
trade of size
CEs = colluding entities
UC = undercut
NC = no change
note for today (this post) ~ CTIX
Open 1.33
Day High 1.33
Day Low 1.27
Previous Close
09/07/2016 1.33
52-Week High ** 1.00 range will begin decreasing
11/25/2015 1.955
52-Week Low
10/23/2015 0.9412
Price Performance (Last 52 Weeks)
09/07/2016 -26.11%
Volume 53,403
Volume (10 day Average) 165 ,603 ** algo volume
Volume (90 day Average) 162 ,333 ** algo volume
ask yourself .. would you spend the time on a SMB if you had no financial interest .. (btw .. that interest can be both long or short or trading a %)
then ask yourself .. would the system be gamed (money garnered) by preying on retails' ignorance
now multiply those trades for one legit OTC company .. by 1000s ..
suspect it's been like taking candy from a baby ~ for damn near a decade +
4kids
5
