Hmm. Well, you are almost right. I tend to dif
Post# of 1288
First: That it would be easier to sue Bill than go through the NAFTA process. Bullshit, or, you and others would have already done that, which you have not......and to boot, NO attorney in his/her right mind would attempt to do that, or, again, it would have already begun. That is simply you trying to stir up shit and bashing Bill.
Second : You are totally off base with the conflict of interests in having a previous hearing, and filing a NAFTA claim. You obviously read a lot......in fact, just enough for you to confuse the issues, and then try to put out what you consider legal backup for your claims as actual points of law. Unfortunately , for you, what you have done is to find things that agree with your thinking and try to apply them to back up your beliefs. That is a common mistake. Take the passion out of your thinking and understand the real issues.
Because you WANT it to be that way......does not make it that way.
Again, do not over think things. That is exactly what you are doing and by doing so, you are not thinking things through.
I am done with this conversation. I do hope you figure it out.
GLTA