They have those. They reported them, and they will

They have those. They reported them, and they will be reporting all of them going forward. They have moved to being a fully reporting transparent company, but they just started selling product a year and a half ago. If you're going to invest in a start up with a track record that short, you can't rely on bean counter methodology as you're determining factor. If that's what you need, why are you here? Crawford04 was even more ridiculous about it, spewing foolishness like that when they were only a couple of months into sales with a completely new brand, and with all kinds of start up costs up front guaranteeing that it would be a while until sales revenues pushed them into the green. This isn't a wholly owned subsidy with a rich parent company, they have to do this from the ground up. IMHO, you are using the same argument that Crawdick04 used, and you're still in the wrong ball park. If you aren't a flipper lurking around for another momentum play, then you should be here based on the educated speculation of where this brand is likely to go in this hot market. If you're not here for one of those reasons, then why? How fast did you think we would see profit building a brand using (almost entirely) guerilla marketing and jobber distribution for the first year and a half? Crawdick04 would be proud of your efforts to continue applying big company investment strategy on a small start up just out of the gates. Bravo!