again you miss what i've noted .. to me there

again you miss what i've noted ..

to me there is a very unique quality for those involved in disruptive techs

think outside of the box .. specific to who (which entities) would have both
the passion/persistence (i.e. tenacity) to implement P2O's disruptive tech

we know there is interest based on who already exists in this emerging sector
and who *continues* to invest ..

bottom line is that 100,000 just sourced allows lights on (figuratively) till EOY

if the balance of the 1M sought (900,000) is sourced .. P2O (and RH) survive
thru EO 2017 imo

think about why that would be ..

as i've noted numerous x .. RH has options .. *nothing* is as black and white
as *crews/trolls* like to regurgitate *daily* ..

emerging sector is in its ascension .. that time line is at a minimum 10 years
(remember ACC Executive Summary from October 2014)

i am more than willing to wait out what comes to pass .. imo no one who has
doubts or is clueless about the OTCs' embedded (illegal) manipulation
should invest a dime .. but anyone who has been around for as long as
*most* here with *interest* have been .. are fully cognizant of what is what

one of the interesting side effects of a *stalled* stock .. with *targeted* co.s
ability to execute is *volume* (partially but not 100% legit that accompanies
a mostly *controlled* run b4 round is then attempted to be reset) .. it will
be interesting to see what comes to pass with P2O's ability to execute
both on volume .. and where the switch (reset) comes to pass (if able)

you might want to familiarize yourself with GEVO's *actions* this summer
to understand what i'm referencing re: *volume/PPS/cycle of money reset*

when CEs' are on the hook for 8 years and counting re: PTOI .. P2O's ability
to execute .. will absolutely reveal CEs' *efforts* on total display for all with interest to see

remember too .. there are always 2 parties in play (not just P2O)

4kids