Your lack of understanding about what constitutes
Post# of 65629
Posted On: 08/29/2016 10:11:50 PM
Your lack of understanding about what constitutes scientific proof is apparent.
The picture of the polar bears in no way detracts from the validity of the 5 analytically tight points. And 'well written' confirms that emotionalism did not creep into the piece.
I see a scientific consensus on this subject, you see a conspiracy.
The people in the fossil fuel industry, on the subject of climate change, are analogous to the tobacco company executives who swore under oath that
They were almost certainly lying, at least about their 'beliefs'.
'Belief'' is the connective tissue in the body of conservative policy, and in what passes for conservative 'thought'. 'Belief' influences and perverts science and economics in obvious ways.
'Intelligent design' and 'supply side economics', for example
The picture of the polar bears in no way detracts from the validity of the 5 analytically tight points. And 'well written' confirms that emotionalism did not creep into the piece.
I see a scientific consensus on this subject, you see a conspiracy.
The people in the fossil fuel industry, on the subject of climate change, are analogous to the tobacco company executives who swore under oath that
Quote:
....they did not believe that cigarettes were addictive, but that they would rather their own children did not smoke.
http://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/15/us/tobacco-...wanted=all
They were almost certainly lying, at least about their 'beliefs'.
'Belief'' is the connective tissue in the body of conservative policy, and in what passes for conservative 'thought'. 'Belief' influences and perverts science and economics in obvious ways.
'Intelligent design' and 'supply side economics', for example
(1)
(0)