i strongly suspect if time could be reversed 2 thi
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 08/22/2016 10:32:08 AM
Re: Commando911 #33072
i strongly suspect if time could be reversed 2 things that came to pass wouldn't happen with P2O
JB would have had P2O remain Private until Flagship's evolution and
there would have been no R/M into a *shell* littered with priors .. allowed
daily by those *tasked* with retail
as for RH .. he's *it* .. clearly following a path .. of his choosing
which is why i take last week's 8K as reinforcement that there is a *there* .. there
doors remain open thru EOY *imo* .. most likely to allow *those* who do
have passion and tenacity re: P2O's disruptive tech to *complete* aspects
i suspect have been in play since decision to not renew ECO came to pass
one could argue that going the route with ECO was as mis-guided as
RH's shutting down NF ..
one could argue *assets* should have been sold or leased in 2014
one could argue that handling of 4 and 5 could have been *wiser*
one could argue that RH wasn't *aware* of OTC stock manipulation
even tho' he'd been an *investor* in P2O *early* .. so would have observed
PPS *gyrations* from the git go .. but clearly wasn't digested
but all that doesn't change *reality* .. tech works .. it is disruptive .. there
are entities who do want it .. and there are multiple options that exist for P2O
(the company)
as for the stock .. *volume* .. with all that that entails .. shows lines long since
drawn in the sand ..
curious to see if RH can manage an UPDATE with Q being filed .. or if in his
mind the 8K filed last week was his version of a Shareholders' Update
5 months after the last one in March
4kids
JB would have had P2O remain Private until Flagship's evolution and
there would have been no R/M into a *shell* littered with priors .. allowed
daily by those *tasked* with retail
as for RH .. he's *it* .. clearly following a path .. of his choosing
which is why i take last week's 8K as reinforcement that there is a *there* .. there
doors remain open thru EOY *imo* .. most likely to allow *those* who do
have passion and tenacity re: P2O's disruptive tech to *complete* aspects
i suspect have been in play since decision to not renew ECO came to pass
one could argue that going the route with ECO was as mis-guided as
RH's shutting down NF ..
one could argue *assets* should have been sold or leased in 2014
one could argue that handling of 4 and 5 could have been *wiser*
one could argue that RH wasn't *aware* of OTC stock manipulation
even tho' he'd been an *investor* in P2O *early* .. so would have observed
PPS *gyrations* from the git go .. but clearly wasn't digested
but all that doesn't change *reality* .. tech works .. it is disruptive .. there
are entities who do want it .. and there are multiple options that exist for P2O
(the company)
as for the stock .. *volume* .. with all that that entails .. shows lines long since
drawn in the sand ..
curious to see if RH can manage an UPDATE with Q being filed .. or if in his
mind the 8K filed last week was his version of a Shareholders' Update
5 months after the last one in March
4kids
(0)
(0)