The analysis here is fairly simple...does Mr. Hedd

The analysis here is fairly simple...does Mr. Heddle know that PTOI has a disruptive technology??...and if he does, is he able to use his words to describe to other people the reason that he knows the technology is disruptive?? If both of the answers are 'yes' then Mr. Heddle should have no problem getting enough investment to finally get a processor running.

Mr. Bordynuik knew this very well and clearly articulated to investors the he had a fully tested, scalable process which could make crude oil, for which he had offers for WTI-$3 from refineries, at a cost of under $10/bbl when "loaded up with costs." Mr. Bordynuik was able to get investors to put in tens of millions of dollars.

The problem was that Mr. Bordynuik is a swindler who probably couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. The constant misinformation and the fraud suits against him for cooking the books should probably have been ample warning to investors that he's a scoundrel...but similar to penny stock scam victims on multiple message boards, investors aren't always willing to believe they've been scammed.

So why isn't Mr. Heddle describing the results of this supposedly disruptive technology to investors?? I think investors already know the answer to that but many may not want to admit that they've been swindled.

Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.