Reading the Sullivan Motion for Sanctions...this i
Post# of 72435
![](/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
Quote:
Basically he's saying that the existence of "non-frivolous" claims within a complaint does not negate the DUTY (emphasis added) of the court to levy PSLRA Rule 11 sanctions with regard to the frivolous clams made.
This is truly good stuff!
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)