$TPAC Mag, some great points made there. I have been telling people close to me who are looking at this two things as far as when I see this taking off, with tonight's chart analysis aside(ps accum line for today now showing on tradingview): 1) IR has a target of .01 EOY 2016, which I qualify by stating that that may only happen if SLA starts Q4, though I may not be privy to other rev info, and 2) Significant action that is based on fundamentals may not occur until 4/2017 (thanks to ST4N for bringing that date to the board's attention a few months back). Though, as you said, we are close. I still see a chart move in the works, even if it goes like it did before the last run kicked off, going from .0005 to mid-.001's then back to .0005 before hitting .006's and .007's.
What the company is doing behind the scenes and what is being alluded to in terms of numbers (some even into the billions, gross rev) with percentage takeaways from 5-22%, respectively, is incredible. It very much does seem as if a conglomerate is in the works. And with hybrid fueling occurring on the automotive level, it is only a matter of time before that becomes mainstream in aviation and aerospace, which then may go hand in hand with the lithium and oil being exported, though for clarity, I am by no means stating the BCLO is equivalent to jet fuel, but more so, the sourcing capabilities.
What RSALAZAR posted was a new insight for me. While I have come across the occasional OTC above a dollar, I had no idea about Siemens, which as mentioned, is trading just shy of $120.
I am very excited for all that's to come and can't wait to see what avenues they surprise us with next. With that, my closing question is: What else does China need that TPAC can potentially provide?
What the company is doing behind the scenes and what is being alluded to in terms of numbers (some even into the billions, gross rev) with percentage takeaways from 5-22%, respectively, is incredible. It very much does seem as if a conglomerate is in the works. And with hybrid fueling occurring on the automotive level, it is only a matter of time before that becomes mainstream in aviation and aerospace, which then may go hand in hand with the lithium and oil being exported, though for clarity, I am by no means stating the BCLO is equivalent to jet fuel, but more so, the sourcing capabilities.
What RSALAZAR posted was a new insight for me. While I have come across the occasional OTC above a dollar, I had no idea about Siemens, which as mentioned, is trading just shy of $120.
I am very excited for all that's to come and can't wait to see what avenues they surprise us with next. With that, my closing question is: What else does China need that TPAC can potentially provide?
9
Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.
