"he hasn't taken a salary" I'm sorry, but the o
Post# of 43064
I'm sorry, but the only way I will believe you that Mr. Heddle hasn't taken any salary is if you provide circular logic with no fewer than two or three steps, all laden with biased optimistic assumptions that tie in colluding entities, followed by the inference that not receiving a salary also means Mr. Heddle has not received any compensation whatsoever from PTOI.
Short of that, your authoritative and definitive statement that Mr. Heddle hasn't taken a salary will have to be downgraded to the status of 'conjecture' just like my guess that much of the money he did loan to the company went right back into his own pocket.