Some of you guys are ridiculously emotional, and shortsighted in that you refuse to look at the broad picture of what is taking place. If it were not so sad, it would be very funny.
Allow me to point a couple of things out for you, please.
FIRST.....With the JR : Because of the revamping of the MMPR / MMAR.....it would make little to no sense in pursuing a continuance of the actions of the illegal activities which we're taking place, with respect to how individuals within the program acted unlawfully for their personal agenda's. Simply was not the correct format to deal with that.
SECOND.......With respect to the OMB and the Lakeshore issues :
There is absolutely no doubt that Lakeshore and the persons involved in the shafting we got there were wrong. Unfortunately, the damage has been done, and there is no turning back from that.
The damage being already done is the key issue. The laws in place we're there, should have been recognized, and we're not. That simple fact will NEVER change and we do not have to prove that with the OMB.
THIRD.......Has everyone forgotten what the NAFTA CHAPTER 11 was originally about, and why it came into being ?
Briefly, it stops entity's in government from doing the things that both Lakeshore and Health Canada have done. There is no doubt that Lakeshore did what they did because we have the proof of records, etc.. Also, there is no doubt that Health Canada did what they did as we have proof of records, etc., there as well. So, we could either fight 3 battles, in order to prove something that requires no further proof, or , we can fight one battle, present the substantial evidence, as well as show that it was a concerted effort by persons who were government officials, in their capacity, and that they acted unlawfully to cause us harm.
So, go figure........which do you really think is the smarter, wiser thing to do.??? No one has , 'lost' , anything so stop with all the whining already. Use your head.
ALL JMO OF COURSE. GLTA
Allow me to point a couple of things out for you, please.
FIRST.....With the JR : Because of the revamping of the MMPR / MMAR.....it would make little to no sense in pursuing a continuance of the actions of the illegal activities which we're taking place, with respect to how individuals within the program acted unlawfully for their personal agenda's. Simply was not the correct format to deal with that.
SECOND.......With respect to the OMB and the Lakeshore issues :
There is absolutely no doubt that Lakeshore and the persons involved in the shafting we got there were wrong. Unfortunately, the damage has been done, and there is no turning back from that.
The damage being already done is the key issue. The laws in place we're there, should have been recognized, and we're not. That simple fact will NEVER change and we do not have to prove that with the OMB.
THIRD.......Has everyone forgotten what the NAFTA CHAPTER 11 was originally about, and why it came into being ?
Briefly, it stops entity's in government from doing the things that both Lakeshore and Health Canada have done. There is no doubt that Lakeshore did what they did because we have the proof of records, etc.. Also, there is no doubt that Health Canada did what they did as we have proof of records, etc., there as well. So, we could either fight 3 battles, in order to prove something that requires no further proof, or , we can fight one battle, present the substantial evidence, as well as show that it was a concerted effort by persons who were government officials, in their capacity, and that they acted unlawfully to cause us harm.
So, go figure........which do you really think is the smarter, wiser thing to do.??? No one has , 'lost' , anything so stop with all the whining already. Use your head.
ALL JMO OF COURSE. GLTA
5
In times when you feel low self esteem, disappointment and perhaps even depression.......keep in mind that it may simply be the result of the fact that you are surrounded by ass holes. GLTA
