I'll have to say, I don't know whether or not Mr.
Post# of 43064
Who exactly was able to read past every word in the article, focus on the phrase of Mr. Bordynuik saying he sold his shares, declare that false and then convert the whole article into a theme that Mr. Bordynuik still owns millions of shares?? What the...??!! Is that diversion an attempt to keep investors from talking about Mr. Bordynuik's latest venture and his saying that it's a much better investment than PTOI?
Personally I think every time someone references the article and announces their belief that Mr. Bordynuik owns millions of shares, the answer should be the simple rhetorical question, "Then why did he say that chemical recycling is a much better investment than PTOI??" Further argument is futile.
All of this minutia is pointless. There's a reason why neither Mr. Bordynuik nor Mr. Heddle ever released the results of the processor runs and that reason is not because those results are so amazing that it would compel investors to gobble up all of PTOI's shares at astronomically high prices. The reason is that the $10/bbl diesel and crude oil claims were fake...and Mr. Heddle doesn't want to open himself up to fraud charges by re-iterating those claims and he doesn't want to lose investors by showing the real results.