and lastly .. and most likely the most compelling
Post# of 1460
is undertaken after well executed *raids* .. is because they (those who
always try to control outcomes) don't want *investors* .. rather they want
to condition *retail* to trade .. so the next time CEs' *orchestrate* AVXL
up (and i have no doubts AVXL will be *relo'd* UP in due course) .. CEs'
want those *shares* .. this is why i've continually noted that *volume* matters
quality of that *volume* can be ascertained by looking at daily tape of trades
this is one reason why i personally have taken my 100% *investment* approach
from 2000 onward (fairly easy to be an *investor* back in the days of Fido's
$200 *trade* pricetag) ..
and now hold a core of X shares and set GTCs on both sides .. (buys/sells)
usually % done via GTCs is 20% to 25% .. so if 10000 shares are held
in core .. 2000 to 2500 will be utilized for *trading* .. and i never try to
time tops or bottoms .. but could see *patterns* in play on AVXL on that
last *orchestrated* set up to 8.30 and had my GTC *sell* @ 8.00
that was partially rebought in the upper 6 .. 3.75 and today's buy
for this next round i'm watching to see if CEs' can work *emotions* to part
and if *volume* correlates .. to *tape of trades* .. i tend to focus on 10 and
90 day avgs for algos' efforts ..
i am curious as to where next round is taken .. imo if able .. 2.00 to 2.50
will be undertaken to *part* legit shares (brutal shake of retail) .. that is
pre R/S pricing of .50 to .625c ..
i am not saying CEs' will be able to do this .. but it's the next round/range
i'm watching *volume* for ..
best to all Anavex investors ..
edit .. news always trumps CEs' *efforts* .. and the motto know what you own is always in play ..
4kids