Donald Trump Gets Bipartisan Condemnation for NATO
Post# of 51168
Posted On: 07/21/2016 7:04:54 PM
Donald Trump Gets Bipartisan Condemnation for NATO Comments
He is not anti NATO
He will simply ask them to pay a decent share.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump drew swift rebukes from both ends of the political spectrum, as well as from NATO’s top official, for his declaration that, if he is president, the United States will defend fellow NATO countries only if the countries in question were contributing their fair share to NATO’s budget.
“We’re talking about countries that are doing very well. Then yes, I would be absolutely prepared to tell those countries, ‘Congratulations, you will be defending yourself,’” Trump said during an interview with The New York Times, adding that he would defend only countries that had “fulfilled their obligations to us” financially.
In an interview with the New York Times, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called Trump's comments a "rookie mistake."
“I am willing to kind of chalk it up to a rookie mistake,” he said. “I don’t think there is anybody he would choose to be secretary of defense or secretary of state who would have a different view from my own.”
Two additional Senate Republicans, neither of whom is attending this week’s Republican National Convention, condemned his comments, suggesting Congress would not follow his lead on the issue if he is commander-in-chief.
“As [Russian President Vladimir] Putin revives Soviet-style aggression and the threat of violent Islam looms over European and American cities, the United States stands with our NATO allies,” Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., one of the most vocal elected officials in the never-Trump movement, said in a statement.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., one of Trump’s former Republican primary opponents, accused him of appeasing the Russian president with his assertions.
“I can only imagine how our allies in NATO, particularly the Balkan states, must feel after reading these comments from Mr. Trump. I’m 100 percent certain how Russian President Putin feels — he’s a very happy man,” Graham said.
“If Mr. Trump is serious about wanting to be commander-in-chief, he needs to better understand the job, which is to provide leadership for the United States and the free world,” Graham continued, also calling for Trump to “correct” his statements during his prime-time address Thursday evening.
Members of the Democratic Party also slammed Trump’s remarks, accusing him of friendliness with the same unsavory leaders with whom Republicans have accused President Barack Obama of being too conciliatory.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest noted that Republicans have long accused Obama of going on a “global apology tour.”
“I guess that means that there is some irony associated with the case that’s being made by the Republican nominee at this point,” Earnest said.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign condemned Trump’s remarks, also accusing him of cozying up to Putin.
“Over the course of this campaign, Trump has displayed a bizarre and occasionally obsequious fascination with Russia’s strongman, Vladimir Putin. And he has policy positions — and advisers — to match,” Clinton senior policy adviser Jake Sullivan said, citing a Washington Post report that Trump staffers persuaded convention delegates to strip language from the GOP platform that would have called for “providing lethal defensive weapons” to the Ukrainian military.
The White House has declined to provide Ukraine with lethal weapons, but mainstream Republicans have long called for the president to do so.
“Just this week, we learned that the Trump campaign went to great lengths to remove a plank from the GOP platform about aid to Ukraine that would have offended Putin, bucking a strongly held position within his own party ... It is fair to assume that Vladimir Putin is rooting for a Trump presidency.”
Although NATO does not frequently comment on issues related to member nations’ domestic politics, Jens Stoltenberg, NATO’s secretary-general, weighed in on Trump’s comments, defending European allies’ contributions to NATO while avoiding commenting on the election directly.
“European allies are also stepping up,” he said. “For the first time in many years, defense spending among European allies and Canada rose last year.”
Secretary of State John Kerry was also pulled in to the fracas Thursday, fielding a question about Trump's comments at a press conference at the State Department.
Prefacing his comments by saying he wasn't making a statement about the presidential race, Kerry said he would restate American policy towards NATO.
"This administration, like every administration Republican and Democrat alike since 1949, remains fully committed to the NATO alliance and to our security commitments under article five, which is absolutely bedrock to our membership and to our partnership with NATO."
He is not anti NATO
He will simply ask them to pay a decent share.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump drew swift rebukes from both ends of the political spectrum, as well as from NATO’s top official, for his declaration that, if he is president, the United States will defend fellow NATO countries only if the countries in question were contributing their fair share to NATO’s budget.
“We’re talking about countries that are doing very well. Then yes, I would be absolutely prepared to tell those countries, ‘Congratulations, you will be defending yourself,’” Trump said during an interview with The New York Times, adding that he would defend only countries that had “fulfilled their obligations to us” financially.
In an interview with the New York Times, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called Trump's comments a "rookie mistake."
“I am willing to kind of chalk it up to a rookie mistake,” he said. “I don’t think there is anybody he would choose to be secretary of defense or secretary of state who would have a different view from my own.”
Two additional Senate Republicans, neither of whom is attending this week’s Republican National Convention, condemned his comments, suggesting Congress would not follow his lead on the issue if he is commander-in-chief.
“As [Russian President Vladimir] Putin revives Soviet-style aggression and the threat of violent Islam looms over European and American cities, the United States stands with our NATO allies,” Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., one of the most vocal elected officials in the never-Trump movement, said in a statement.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., one of Trump’s former Republican primary opponents, accused him of appeasing the Russian president with his assertions.
“I can only imagine how our allies in NATO, particularly the Balkan states, must feel after reading these comments from Mr. Trump. I’m 100 percent certain how Russian President Putin feels — he’s a very happy man,” Graham said.
“If Mr. Trump is serious about wanting to be commander-in-chief, he needs to better understand the job, which is to provide leadership for the United States and the free world,” Graham continued, also calling for Trump to “correct” his statements during his prime-time address Thursday evening.
Members of the Democratic Party also slammed Trump’s remarks, accusing him of friendliness with the same unsavory leaders with whom Republicans have accused President Barack Obama of being too conciliatory.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest noted that Republicans have long accused Obama of going on a “global apology tour.”
“I guess that means that there is some irony associated with the case that’s being made by the Republican nominee at this point,” Earnest said.
Hillary Clinton’s campaign condemned Trump’s remarks, also accusing him of cozying up to Putin.
“Over the course of this campaign, Trump has displayed a bizarre and occasionally obsequious fascination with Russia’s strongman, Vladimir Putin. And he has policy positions — and advisers — to match,” Clinton senior policy adviser Jake Sullivan said, citing a Washington Post report that Trump staffers persuaded convention delegates to strip language from the GOP platform that would have called for “providing lethal defensive weapons” to the Ukrainian military.
The White House has declined to provide Ukraine with lethal weapons, but mainstream Republicans have long called for the president to do so.
“Just this week, we learned that the Trump campaign went to great lengths to remove a plank from the GOP platform about aid to Ukraine that would have offended Putin, bucking a strongly held position within his own party ... It is fair to assume that Vladimir Putin is rooting for a Trump presidency.”
Although NATO does not frequently comment on issues related to member nations’ domestic politics, Jens Stoltenberg, NATO’s secretary-general, weighed in on Trump’s comments, defending European allies’ contributions to NATO while avoiding commenting on the election directly.
“European allies are also stepping up,” he said. “For the first time in many years, defense spending among European allies and Canada rose last year.”
Secretary of State John Kerry was also pulled in to the fracas Thursday, fielding a question about Trump's comments at a press conference at the State Department.
Prefacing his comments by saying he wasn't making a statement about the presidential race, Kerry said he would restate American policy towards NATO.
"This administration, like every administration Republican and Democrat alike since 1949, remains fully committed to the NATO alliance and to our security commitments under article five, which is absolutely bedrock to our membership and to our partnership with NATO."
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼