there is nothing inconsistent with my trading/message. i have stated numerous times where i have purchased shares and my positions on those trades. the fundamentals have changed with teh company and i am adjusting accordingly.
i have 8 figures of shares in low trips. i have 8 figures above. eventually, VNDM will be exhausted and supply/demand will flip and there will be an increase and probably a "run" fueled by speculation on new Boeing relationships. i and others have cautioned numerous times on the limited impact of the Boeing relationship on short and medium term revenues due to long sales/production cycle to get from start to actual production - doesnt happen over night. that does not mean the market wont act upon the news/speculation and that MMs wont aggressively manipulate the trading up and down based on that speculation.
i ignored that trading "noise" previously as i was investing long term based on the fundamentals at the time. right now - those fundamentals are completely in the air until the company gets out of the 90 day reconstruction period and states new plans on company structure, financing, revenue guidance, and cash flow IF they do.
so - until i regain those warm and fuzzies that the shareholders are front and center - i will take advantage of that "noise" in the meantime. on a spike to $0.0020 (or high teens or high 20s) - i am still making 6-8X my money on those original trip shares that i held onto during the run to the 70s. will it go there again? possibly. i will still have plenty of shares with a cost basis around trading price today to take advantage of that. will i patiently wait for that long term return like i did last year with a disciplined approach based on the fundamentals at the time - no. not unless the company provides those fundamentals to investors and allows me to properly manage risk/reward relative to my own profile and expectations.
you can try and paint the obvious with a different brush. the difference between me and many others in the same boat with large positions and reevaluating the long term projections is i am willing to put it in plain language for those that are new and/or struggling to really understand how the market works and the difference between traders and investors.
if the board is not interested in hearing the pros and cons - i will quit posting. it serves me no benefit if this becomes the opposite of iLie where anything positive is deleted or attacked. the price is down 50%+ on heavy volume since IR started posting. to act like everything is sunshine and roses and they are being effective is being disingenuous. they are alienating much needed, long term investors who are being forced to reevaluate holdings/timelines due to the added uncertainty.
"You have an awful lot to say.....But somehow I completely missed Anything Meaningful.....Period.......Other Than Pure Conjecture"
if it isnt meaningful - why reply? i know several long term shareholders that HAVE lightened holdings significantly from the high teens due to this uncertainty. i am provided the reasoning. while i have not sold any on the decline (and recently again started buying at 0.001) i am buying with a much different timeline than i was when i was buying at 0.0002-0.0004 early in 2015. THAT is significant. i have a strong base and can completely cover my capital and then some on what would be a trivial run to 20. however, the company can not get ahead on a PPS standpoint if investors continue to go from a long term to a short term view even if it is with only part of their holdings.
"Last time I looked at TPAC Trades, it's over 8 Mil traded and looked Pretty Green to Me........ "
last trade was at $0.0009 and makes it down 18.18% for the day. while it was an insignificant trade, the majority of the trades today were at 0.001 which still makes a red day.
"Terrific Messages Today from Muse / Bill Personally........WTF is Your Point.......Do you want pictures of " staff" to satisfy your Own Need...... "
those are potentially very terrific messages. right now - the market is not providing any value to them as it is still trading down. where is all of the buying based on the enthusiasm? with a number of the posters on here being very enthusiastic - the PPS should be going up on inclining volume and not the opposite. unless those on here are completely BSing the board.
i see potential substantial long term value here. i see potential significant short term trading potential. mostly i see a very volatile and risky mid term due to dilution/increasing OS and ambiguity on time lines.
"Boy oh Boy....And when Bill / TPAC announces a Contract with Boeing.....Then Whats the Argument......????.......It's Not Big Enough.......????"
what kind of argument is this...? what has been announced by the company since the beginning of the year in terms of contracts that are specific and revenue producing for 2016? what is the financial impact of the SLAs in 2016? correct me if i am wrong but there has been nothing announced in terms of specific numbers from actual production that investors can attribute to 2016. i see that as a problem when the 5 year plan previously provided would have put 2016 at several million. Bill has not confirmed if they are still on track for that Y1 guidance. IR has not confirmed that. why? it is a simple and legitimate question based on original biz plan. if company announces a contract with Boeing (or anyone else - I do not see Boeing as being the long term prize here) where it is "x" dollars starting in "x" quarter with "x" length of time frame - then it could be directly applied to original growth plans, cash flow, and then investors could determine if the company will have sufficient cash flow and no further dilution would have to be factored in to PPS.
finally - i continue to disagree with you about IRs identity being confidential/non disclosed. are they employees or on contract? are they being directly paid or being paid in shares? are those shares fixed or convertible? this isnt about showing someone your paycheck. this is about transparency and accountability of a public company. more so - the trust investors place in that transparency when dealing with OTC companies where that is well below 5%. Bill's compensation is public as he is an officer. do they work for the company as employees or completely separate? that is a BIG difference in terms of bias and culpability. i am stunned that any shareholder would NOT want to know where the inherent bias lies. i dont need names of every individual or what individuals that arent officers are being compensated. however, when they are in constant and controlling access of inside information and legally bound to disclosure rules - then i do expect to know whether they are company employees or a 3rd party firm. if 3rd party - i do want to know if their compensation is fixed or tied to PPS performance.
"So Proud to be a Long...and yet Soo Proud to announce that " your new positions " are for Flips.....WHO Do You Think Is Going to Get MIXED Messages from reading your Sole Opinion........?????......Really Smalls...???? "
lastly - when did i say i was proud to be a long...? i am a long term investor based on the length of my holdings and not selling on the numerous runs when i could have made 15-20x my money and their was sufficient volume to do so. how many on here claim to be die hard longs but also covering their profits/capital previously and playing with house money...? so that is a legitimate position but me changing my time horizon/investment position based on changing fundamentals (90 day reconstruction plan with ambiguous messaging from IR in the interim while PPS plummets and a known diluter VNDM is constantly on the ASK with consistently hidden shares) but mine isnt or I am sending mixed messages...? that is frankly absurd. i am being rather transparent in my position and how i am evaluating TPAC shares/company. why would i be proud to hold shares at are trading at $0.0009 when i could have dumped them at $0.005-0.007?
if you are going to attack me or try to discredit me further - dont bother. i am not going to get into a pissing match. if others on here feel my posts are too wordy or self serving - let me know and i wont bother.
VNDM has now lowered their ASK to $0.001 and shows the ubiquitous 10K. that is not just retail trading unloading/unwinding positions.
i have 8 figures of shares in low trips. i have 8 figures above. eventually, VNDM will be exhausted and supply/demand will flip and there will be an increase and probably a "run" fueled by speculation on new Boeing relationships. i and others have cautioned numerous times on the limited impact of the Boeing relationship on short and medium term revenues due to long sales/production cycle to get from start to actual production - doesnt happen over night. that does not mean the market wont act upon the news/speculation and that MMs wont aggressively manipulate the trading up and down based on that speculation.
i ignored that trading "noise" previously as i was investing long term based on the fundamentals at the time. right now - those fundamentals are completely in the air until the company gets out of the 90 day reconstruction period and states new plans on company structure, financing, revenue guidance, and cash flow IF they do.
so - until i regain those warm and fuzzies that the shareholders are front and center - i will take advantage of that "noise" in the meantime. on a spike to $0.0020 (or high teens or high 20s) - i am still making 6-8X my money on those original trip shares that i held onto during the run to the 70s. will it go there again? possibly. i will still have plenty of shares with a cost basis around trading price today to take advantage of that. will i patiently wait for that long term return like i did last year with a disciplined approach based on the fundamentals at the time - no. not unless the company provides those fundamentals to investors and allows me to properly manage risk/reward relative to my own profile and expectations.
you can try and paint the obvious with a different brush. the difference between me and many others in the same boat with large positions and reevaluating the long term projections is i am willing to put it in plain language for those that are new and/or struggling to really understand how the market works and the difference between traders and investors.
if the board is not interested in hearing the pros and cons - i will quit posting. it serves me no benefit if this becomes the opposite of iLie where anything positive is deleted or attacked. the price is down 50%+ on heavy volume since IR started posting. to act like everything is sunshine and roses and they are being effective is being disingenuous. they are alienating much needed, long term investors who are being forced to reevaluate holdings/timelines due to the added uncertainty.
"You have an awful lot to say.....But somehow I completely missed Anything Meaningful.....Period.......Other Than Pure Conjecture"
if it isnt meaningful - why reply? i know several long term shareholders that HAVE lightened holdings significantly from the high teens due to this uncertainty. i am provided the reasoning. while i have not sold any on the decline (and recently again started buying at 0.001) i am buying with a much different timeline than i was when i was buying at 0.0002-0.0004 early in 2015. THAT is significant. i have a strong base and can completely cover my capital and then some on what would be a trivial run to 20. however, the company can not get ahead on a PPS standpoint if investors continue to go from a long term to a short term view even if it is with only part of their holdings.
"Last time I looked at TPAC Trades, it's over 8 Mil traded and looked Pretty Green to Me........ "
last trade was at $0.0009 and makes it down 18.18% for the day. while it was an insignificant trade, the majority of the trades today were at 0.001 which still makes a red day.
"Terrific Messages Today from Muse / Bill Personally........WTF is Your Point.......Do you want pictures of " staff" to satisfy your Own Need...... "
those are potentially very terrific messages. right now - the market is not providing any value to them as it is still trading down. where is all of the buying based on the enthusiasm? with a number of the posters on here being very enthusiastic - the PPS should be going up on inclining volume and not the opposite. unless those on here are completely BSing the board.
i see potential substantial long term value here. i see potential significant short term trading potential. mostly i see a very volatile and risky mid term due to dilution/increasing OS and ambiguity on time lines.
"Boy oh Boy....And when Bill / TPAC announces a Contract with Boeing.....Then Whats the Argument......????.......It's Not Big Enough.......????"
what kind of argument is this...? what has been announced by the company since the beginning of the year in terms of contracts that are specific and revenue producing for 2016? what is the financial impact of the SLAs in 2016? correct me if i am wrong but there has been nothing announced in terms of specific numbers from actual production that investors can attribute to 2016. i see that as a problem when the 5 year plan previously provided would have put 2016 at several million. Bill has not confirmed if they are still on track for that Y1 guidance. IR has not confirmed that. why? it is a simple and legitimate question based on original biz plan. if company announces a contract with Boeing (or anyone else - I do not see Boeing as being the long term prize here) where it is "x" dollars starting in "x" quarter with "x" length of time frame - then it could be directly applied to original growth plans, cash flow, and then investors could determine if the company will have sufficient cash flow and no further dilution would have to be factored in to PPS.
finally - i continue to disagree with you about IRs identity being confidential/non disclosed. are they employees or on contract? are they being directly paid or being paid in shares? are those shares fixed or convertible? this isnt about showing someone your paycheck. this is about transparency and accountability of a public company. more so - the trust investors place in that transparency when dealing with OTC companies where that is well below 5%. Bill's compensation is public as he is an officer. do they work for the company as employees or completely separate? that is a BIG difference in terms of bias and culpability. i am stunned that any shareholder would NOT want to know where the inherent bias lies. i dont need names of every individual or what individuals that arent officers are being compensated. however, when they are in constant and controlling access of inside information and legally bound to disclosure rules - then i do expect to know whether they are company employees or a 3rd party firm. if 3rd party - i do want to know if their compensation is fixed or tied to PPS performance.
"So Proud to be a Long...and yet Soo Proud to announce that " your new positions " are for Flips.....WHO Do You Think Is Going to Get MIXED Messages from reading your Sole Opinion........?????......Really Smalls...???? "
lastly - when did i say i was proud to be a long...? i am a long term investor based on the length of my holdings and not selling on the numerous runs when i could have made 15-20x my money and their was sufficient volume to do so. how many on here claim to be die hard longs but also covering their profits/capital previously and playing with house money...? so that is a legitimate position but me changing my time horizon/investment position based on changing fundamentals (90 day reconstruction plan with ambiguous messaging from IR in the interim while PPS plummets and a known diluter VNDM is constantly on the ASK with consistently hidden shares) but mine isnt or I am sending mixed messages...? that is frankly absurd. i am being rather transparent in my position and how i am evaluating TPAC shares/company. why would i be proud to hold shares at are trading at $0.0009 when i could have dumped them at $0.005-0.007?
if you are going to attack me or try to discredit me further - dont bother. i am not going to get into a pissing match. if others on here feel my posts are too wordy or self serving - let me know and i wont bother.
VNDM has now lowered their ASK to $0.001 and shows the ubiquitous 10K. that is not just retail trading unloading/unwinding positions.
10
