The point of the article was that free trade is su
Post# of 65629
enforce.
And that there are inevitable trade-offs, pun intended, between free trade and sovereignty.
The examples of N, Korea and the '30's' were illustrative.
As for Warren, the best she could hope for is better enforcement of existing rules.
Agree with her or not, you'll never see such coherence from Trump.
Hysterical sound bites are not policy prescriptions. Neither is calling Warren Pocahontas helpful to the discussion.