Agreed. The way KBM wrote these contracts up, as y
Post# of 15187
us, is basically self incriminating unto itself. Talk about an uneven
playing field.
I just cant see KBM going far in this one or winning any landmark/lofty
settlement. Once they or HJOE shows the judge the contract for 130% which is compounded daily over the original balance, that would be the end of this case. (or the basic tenants of the agreement, like you have)
It also would bring to light, to the courts ,how they short the stock to manipulate an outcome-for themselves.( and how they basically hold the companies hostage.) Since the borrower will never be able to pay the original loan, the late fee's become more free shares and money-to those companies that offer up more shares. So they get the shares too at a 30% discount and then get 130% on top of that for being late. Simple to see why KBM should just settle now....IMHO This is a built in system that drains the borrower at every turn. Only in this field can the lender dictate pps action to get more shares, then turn around a charge a late fee for an action he caused- and an exorbitant one at that. AMAZING-
TS
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)