I keep seeing this reference to a company's obliga
Post# of 75372
Posted On: 06/15/2016 4:53:12 PM
I keep seeing this reference to a company's obligation or responsibility to it's shareholders, and MoneyMaker229 says regardless of the exchange their stock trades on. The fact is, a company is only responsible to it's shareholders to the extent required by law. Anything above and beyond that is at the company's discretion in order to make investment in them more appealing. I believe Rocky Mountain High Brands has done an excellent job of that, especially given that they're a pink sheet company. Any more self promotion ahead of financial proof of a profitable and growing company would then normally be done through pumping, namely paid pumping. With a pink sheet company lacking proof, it opens the door to accusations of pump and dump fraud which bashers said was taking place even when it actually wasn't. It still isn't, and that's beautiful for longs and flies in the face of scam accusations.
Bottom line is this: if you feel you've suffered personal financial losses due to fraud or misrepresentation, I'm sure some legal firm would love to help you with that. I don't expect to see that press release because I highly doubt they've failed in their responsibilities to shareholders according to SEC regulations. Long and Strong RMHB
Bottom line is this: if you feel you've suffered personal financial losses due to fraud or misrepresentation, I'm sure some legal firm would love to help you with that. I don't expect to see that press release because I highly doubt they've failed in their responsibilities to shareholders according to SEC regulations. Long and Strong RMHB
(2)
(0)