Sure, I thought it was on-topic, but nobody wants
Post# of 15187
Posted On: 06/15/2016 11:36:51 AM
Sure, I thought it was on-topic, but nobody wants the truth revealed....
The response was to IGLOW
I've asked several questions to HJOE privately and have received quick and satisfactory responses as well as many other shareholders. They also know that I am a SH and very much support my investment dollars and their company. The answer to your question is simple. They dislike those that don't support the company, because they know that those who don't support the company are not shareholders, and, they wish to ruin the them.
Now, why would an individual wish to ruin a company or its chances if there weren't an agenda behind it? I would think that if there were nothing on the line for an individual, they'd have nothing to say about the company. If there is no skin in the game, what is the purpose of posting negative sentiment day in and day out, over and over, without a purpose??
HJOEs contention is there is certainly a purpose and that purpose has ill will behind it. I agree with that, it is clearly evident. Thus, why answer those questions. Why subject themselves to harassment? Better to block that individual so as not to be harassed. I'm not writing about stock or filings, I'm simply pointing out that people have been harassing them and attempting to interfere with their business operations. You may ask, "What have people done to interfere," but I am certain you already know that answer to your own questions.
No he wouldn't. Because to do so, without filings would open further scrutiny by the SEC. It would make zero sense to tweet about revenues with no filings. PRs and tweets are not what the company needs to be doing and I do believe they are closely following their lawyers directions.
The HJOE counter implies that KBM was complicit in directing or suggesting that HJOE use KBM. Whether that flies in court is something we will all find out. What I think HJOE detractors underestimated is the companies ability to fight back and their willingness to take this further. They certainly couldn't do it if they were as insolvent as many here claim.
This is a slippery slope for KBM and their supporters. Tread carefully.
The response was to IGLOW
I've asked several questions to HJOE privately and have received quick and satisfactory responses as well as many other shareholders. They also know that I am a SH and very much support my investment dollars and their company. The answer to your question is simple. They dislike those that don't support the company, because they know that those who don't support the company are not shareholders, and, they wish to ruin the them.
Now, why would an individual wish to ruin a company or its chances if there weren't an agenda behind it? I would think that if there were nothing on the line for an individual, they'd have nothing to say about the company. If there is no skin in the game, what is the purpose of posting negative sentiment day in and day out, over and over, without a purpose??
HJOEs contention is there is certainly a purpose and that purpose has ill will behind it. I agree with that, it is clearly evident. Thus, why answer those questions. Why subject themselves to harassment? Better to block that individual so as not to be harassed. I'm not writing about stock or filings, I'm simply pointing out that people have been harassing them and attempting to interfere with their business operations. You may ask, "What have people done to interfere," but I am certain you already know that answer to your own questions.
Quote:
Adamson would be shouting from the rooftops and posting 24/7 on Twitter about the revenue if it was all that great
No he wouldn't. Because to do so, without filings would open further scrutiny by the SEC. It would make zero sense to tweet about revenues with no filings. PRs and tweets are not what the company needs to be doing and I do believe they are closely following their lawyers directions.
Quote:
why did HJOE hire a Pump and Dump Auditor - Terry Johnson
The HJOE counter implies that KBM was complicit in directing or suggesting that HJOE use KBM. Whether that flies in court is something we will all find out. What I think HJOE detractors underestimated is the companies ability to fight back and their willingness to take this further. They certainly couldn't do it if they were as insolvent as many here claim.
This is a slippery slope for KBM and their supporters. Tread carefully.
(0)
(0)