I added Debry's inquiry to the state. And I am hap
Post# of 7795
Posted On: 06/12/2016 11:19:54 AM
I added Debry's inquiry to the state. And I am happy to discuss this at length.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/315495015/De-Bry-a...ts-1917-19
A novice might not understand salvage law, and I'm no expert, but this is fairly elementary. A project archaeologist is assigned to the project. In this case it would be Sinclair. He is actually considered the leader as far as the state is concerned. Notice in the link below how RETIRED Roger Smith, who copied Mary and Robert Bendus in the email to the Defendant (the one Kyle claimed didn't inquire) this statement, which is right after it's explained they have no 80/20 agreement and issuance of future permits is not guaranteed....
Under the supervision of the permittee's archaeologist....
Each project has an archaeologist assigned, and that is submitted with the application. If that changes then the FBAR is to be notified. Same with crews members, financial ability, etc. It's in the permit documents.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/299332582/2014-05-...on-Area-A2
Notice on the first page below Sinclair is the project archaeologist. DeBry is not mentioned anywhere. See #2 under Requirements and Conditions. The permittee designates the archaeologist. And see #8 about changes in personnel.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED
I didn't get 6000 emails? I got the file the FBAR provided, but anyone can get it per Chapter 119 of the Florida statutes. A lot of what I have is field notes and applications.
Sure, we have failed inspections. But we never failed to call them in. If the inspector, the state or local offices needed something, we provided it. It varies from city to city and state to state.
Failing to file interim and annual reports AS REQUIRED is inexcusable. Why would DeBry be notified by the crew? Why isn't Sinclair on board?
Now I realize there is a dispute about if he's suppose to be there everyday, and that's fine, but DeBry is not assigned to the project, Sinclair is. He is to supervise operations.
Whether Kyle knew or not, DeBry's contact with the FBAR was not appropriate. That was the point Mary was making.
SFRX is a public company. They have responsibilities as such. Putting out false PR's, certifying false reports to the SEC, and posting videos on Facebook about using PROHIBITED equipment is totally irresponsible.
If Kyle didn't understand the permit that was issued, that's fine. Make the needed corrections including telling the Court he made false statements REPEATEDLY in the original complaint. In doing so he defamed the Defendant and according to Clifford Hunt, ESQ, the Defendant is entitled to damages. I hope he collects.
If you have any other questions, let me know.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/315495015/De-Bry-a...ts-1917-19
Quote:
Here is a fact I can read!
Kyle is working with Dr Debry... A notorious archeologists with lots and lots of experience.
Kyle is also working with Sinclair. A notorious archeologist with tons and tons of experience.
It's hard to rebut just the freaking emails you provide because no one knows the emails before or after.
A novice might not understand salvage law, and I'm no expert, but this is fairly elementary. A project archaeologist is assigned to the project. In this case it would be Sinclair. He is actually considered the leader as far as the state is concerned. Notice in the link below how RETIRED Roger Smith, who copied Mary and Robert Bendus in the email to the Defendant (the one Kyle claimed didn't inquire) this statement, which is right after it's explained they have no 80/20 agreement and issuance of future permits is not guaranteed....
Under the supervision of the permittee's archaeologist....
Each project has an archaeologist assigned, and that is submitted with the application. If that changes then the FBAR is to be notified. Same with crews members, financial ability, etc. It's in the permit documents.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/299332582/2014-05-...on-Area-A2
Notice on the first page below Sinclair is the project archaeologist. DeBry is not mentioned anywhere. See #2 under Requirements and Conditions. The permittee designates the archaeologist. And see #8 about changes in personnel.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED
I didn't get 6000 emails? I got the file the FBAR provided, but anyone can get it per Chapter 119 of the Florida statutes. A lot of what I have is field notes and applications.
Quote:
You are meaning to tell me you never failed a home inspection. Your subcontractors have ALWAYS been perfect and never jacked up. You meaning to tell me the inspector showed up told you what you needed to do.. You did it... Then they add additional chit they did not mention the first time. ?
Sure, we have failed inspections. But we never failed to call them in. If the inspector, the state or local offices needed something, we provided it. It varies from city to city and state to state.
Failing to file interim and annual reports AS REQUIRED is inexcusable. Why would DeBry be notified by the crew? Why isn't Sinclair on board?
Now I realize there is a dispute about if he's suppose to be there everyday, and that's fine, but DeBry is not assigned to the project, Sinclair is. He is to supervise operations.
Whether Kyle knew or not, DeBry's contact with the FBAR was not appropriate. That was the point Mary was making.
SFRX is a public company. They have responsibilities as such. Putting out false PR's, certifying false reports to the SEC, and posting videos on Facebook about using PROHIBITED equipment is totally irresponsible.
If Kyle didn't understand the permit that was issued, that's fine. Make the needed corrections including telling the Court he made false statements REPEATEDLY in the original complaint. In doing so he defamed the Defendant and according to Clifford Hunt, ESQ, the Defendant is entitled to damages. I hope he collects.
If you have any other questions, let me know.
(1)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼