Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Message Board

I added Debry's inquiry to the state. And I am hap

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 7802
Posted On: 06/12/2016 11:19:54 AM
Avatar
Posted By: hedge_fun
Re: Beleive7 #2510
I added Debry's inquiry to the state. And I am happy to discuss this at length.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/315495015/De-Bry-a...ts-1917-19

Quote:
Here is a fact I can read!

Kyle is working with Dr Debry... A notorious archeologists with lots and lots of experience.

Kyle is also working with Sinclair. A notorious archeologist with tons and tons of experience.

It's hard to rebut just the freaking emails you provide because no one knows the emails before or after.



A novice might not understand salvage law, and I'm no expert, but this is fairly elementary. A project archaeologist is assigned to the project. In this case it would be Sinclair. He is actually considered the leader as far as the state is concerned. Notice in the link below how RETIRED Roger Smith, who copied Mary and Robert Bendus in the email to the Defendant (the one Kyle claimed didn't inquire) this statement, which is right after it's explained they have no 80/20 agreement and issuance of future permits is not guaranteed....

Under the supervision of the permittee's archaeologist....

Each project has an archaeologist assigned, and that is submitted with the application. If that changes then the FBAR is to be notified. Same with crews members, financial ability, etc. It's in the permit documents.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/299332582/2014-05-...on-Area-A2

Notice on the first page below Sinclair is the project archaeologist. DeBry is not mentioned anywhere. See #2 under Requirements and Conditions. The permittee designates the archaeologist. And see #8 about changes in personnel.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/298727048/2014-07-...t-EXECUTED

I didn't get 6000 emails? I got the file the FBAR provided, but anyone can get it per Chapter 119 of the Florida statutes. A lot of what I have is field notes and applications.

Quote:
You are meaning to tell me you never failed a home inspection. Your subcontractors have ALWAYS been perfect and never jacked up. You meaning to tell me the inspector showed up told you what you needed to do.. You did it... Then they add additional chit they did not mention the first time. ?



Sure, we have failed inspections. But we never failed to call them in. If the inspector, the state or local offices needed something, we provided it. It varies from city to city and state to state.

Failing to file interim and annual reports AS REQUIRED is inexcusable. Why would DeBry be notified by the crew? Why isn't Sinclair on board?

Now I realize there is a dispute about if he's suppose to be there everyday, and that's fine, but DeBry is not assigned to the project, Sinclair is. He is to supervise operations.

Whether Kyle knew or not, DeBry's contact with the FBAR was not appropriate. That was the point Mary was making.

SFRX is a public company. They have responsibilities as such. Putting out false PR's, certifying false reports to the SEC, and posting videos on Facebook about using PROHIBITED equipment is totally irresponsible.

If Kyle didn't understand the permit that was issued, that's fine. Make the needed corrections including telling the Court he made false statements REPEATEDLY in the original complaint. In doing so he defamed the Defendant and according to Clifford Hunt, ESQ, the Defendant is entitled to damages. I hope he collects.

If you have any other questions, let me know.



(1)
(0)




Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us