Quote:I am here to wean you off the insanity that is identity politics, and show you that this country is more important than feeling good that "your guy won"
We can start with that, projection. Everything you posted is your opinion of what is and what will be. and much of it is the usual conservative 'wet dreams' about Hillary alleged failings and Trump's invincibility.
The truth is in the middle. Hillary made a mistake with the server, the FBI will determine if there was criminal intent. Absent that intent? No referral to DOJ for prosecution.
Then you're left with Benghazi and the absurdly disproportionate reaction by the GOP relative to 9/11 and the 13 American embassies successfully attacked on THEIR watch. THAT is not lost on that 10% you postulate as decisive in the upcoming election.
At that, none of the 7 Congressional hearings on Benghazi have found Hillary culpable for the 4 deaths.
I do no practice 'identity politics'. I'm a pragmatist. so I don't believe in 'magical thinking' or 'fairy dust economics', both of which are mainstays of GOP 'thinking'.
And think about identity politics the next time Trump denigrates ANY minority group. You KNOW there will be a next time.
As for my penchant for 'foreseeing'? No way to corroborate, but with a conservative I exchange emails I accurately foresaw the two SCOTUS decisions to uphold the ACA as well as Romney's sound beating. I didn't pull those out of my ass. I read widely, and apparently wisely.
That 10% middle may be low, but lets stipulate that's the number.
What is there about Trump that you think appeals to what I assume you regard to be the well educated and better informed that constitute your 'unbiased'?
Lastly, your recounting of Trump's business expertise is a tad rosy and completely overlooks his legal 'difficulties over his Trump U.
And if his business expertise were a sufficient portfolio for the presidency, why all of the 'concern expressed about him' within the GOP?
Will YOU 'feel bad' if Trump loses?
2
