Actually Mary confirmed much of what I have stated
Post# of 7795
Posted On: 06/03/2016 10:54:17 AM
Actually Mary confirmed much of what I have stated before. The research design submitted doesn't mention the Captain's wife nor the company's archaeologist finding gold coins on the current site. If that's the case the FBAR has to be notified in the required reports.
The LLC NEVER had a "recovery" permit for the current site, and there is NO AGREEMENT in place for 3 items. That too would be specified on the permit, which it's not.
As far as Phase 2 goes, Kyle needs to get those environmental permits or all they can do is swim at this point.
And blowers are PROHIBITED. Kyle can explain in his deposition why the April 2, 2015 Facebook posts make mention of them. He can also explain why the SEC filings haven't been amended claiming they had a "recovery" permit. I assume he filed them that way to keep lenders of his back. Which is also likely the reason he filed the lawsuit. Some lenders weren't too happy about the 2 of 3 items BS he was trying to pass off.
2600 pages of documents were handed over, so I would say it went quite well. If a PIPE lender had a conversation with Mary last fall it would be in the files turned over yesterday. There would also be a record about a posters comments on the 2 of 3 items, so the noose is tightening.
Now if one of the company's archaeologist (not Sinclair) confirmed to you as you claim anything about finding gold coins on the current site, then the FBAR is suppose to have a record of it.
Your post, as well wriiten and intended as it may be, won't suffice as far as they are concerned.
Enjoy you day. Tell Huffman the clock is ticking on his response to the reopened file.
But I see nothing about "being wrong" as you have claimed for months now. We'll see about those "alleged" conversations as the files are examined.
I love the written word.
The LLC NEVER had a "recovery" permit for the current site, and there is NO AGREEMENT in place for 3 items. That too would be specified on the permit, which it's not.
As far as Phase 2 goes, Kyle needs to get those environmental permits or all they can do is swim at this point.
And blowers are PROHIBITED. Kyle can explain in his deposition why the April 2, 2015 Facebook posts make mention of them. He can also explain why the SEC filings haven't been amended claiming they had a "recovery" permit. I assume he filed them that way to keep lenders of his back. Which is also likely the reason he filed the lawsuit. Some lenders weren't too happy about the 2 of 3 items BS he was trying to pass off.
2600 pages of documents were handed over, so I would say it went quite well. If a PIPE lender had a conversation with Mary last fall it would be in the files turned over yesterday. There would also be a record about a posters comments on the 2 of 3 items, so the noose is tightening.
Now if one of the company's archaeologist (not Sinclair) confirmed to you as you claim anything about finding gold coins on the current site, then the FBAR is suppose to have a record of it.
Your post, as well wriiten and intended as it may be, won't suffice as far as they are concerned.
Enjoy you day. Tell Huffman the clock is ticking on his response to the reopened file.
But I see nothing about "being wrong" as you have claimed for months now. We'll see about those "alleged" conversations as the files are examined.
I love the written word.
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼