P2O files .. it is clear that mgmt went the route of sales re: P2O's disruptive tech
initially via ECO .. after P2O was wrested back ..
the time frame given to ECO was reasonable per some and unreasonable
by others .. every investor in P2O has their own *awareness* specific to
their own business experience .. disruptive techs are not marketed like
well established enterprises are
the company updated on 3.8.16 re: sales/marketing (internal vs external)
that implementation is what is looked for next ..
it would be ironic if P2O's mgmt closed a deal b4 that implementation
personally I am not expecting that myself .. but i would LMAO if that came to pass b4 anything was implemented by RH specific to the 3.8.16 update
btw as for the latest round ..
just a reminder that it was the opportunity on offer of P2O filing the NT on
the morning of 5.16.16 (first day of the back half of the month of May) that
allowed the shits to do their usual .. while i'll always acknowledge that there
will be legit sales .. rough *volume* for May 2016 .. was on track to be the
lowest (sub 700,000) since 2009/2010 .. until of course the NT got filed and
voila .. *volume* that totaled what 3 other months (since Oct 2015) totaled
(1.1M) ..
or 50% .. know the rigged OTC *game* ..
summer of 2014 .. OBG's involvement kept longs' frustrations in check
summer of 2015 .. ECO's *promise* kept longs' frustrations in check
summer of 2016 .. RH's *intent* keeps longs' frustrations somewhat in check
the ball is in RH's court .. patience by P2O investors isn't unlimited .. that said
this actual P2O investor (like lots of other actual investors) long ago made
the choice re: PTOI (stock) .. which is why trolls' angst continues to ratchet
(supply/demand)
the tech works .. and everyone with *interest* .. knows it ..
now *change* needs to make its appearance specific to P2O
4kids
initially via ECO .. after P2O was wrested back ..
the time frame given to ECO was reasonable per some and unreasonable
by others .. every investor in P2O has their own *awareness* specific to
their own business experience .. disruptive techs are not marketed like
well established enterprises are
the company updated on 3.8.16 re: sales/marketing (internal vs external)
that implementation is what is looked for next ..
it would be ironic if P2O's mgmt closed a deal b4 that implementation
personally I am not expecting that myself .. but i would LMAO if that came to pass b4 anything was implemented by RH specific to the 3.8.16 update
btw as for the latest round ..
just a reminder that it was the opportunity on offer of P2O filing the NT on
the morning of 5.16.16 (first day of the back half of the month of May) that
allowed the shits to do their usual .. while i'll always acknowledge that there
will be legit sales .. rough *volume* for May 2016 .. was on track to be the
lowest (sub 700,000) since 2009/2010 .. until of course the NT got filed and
voila .. *volume* that totaled what 3 other months (since Oct 2015) totaled
(1.1M) ..
or 50% .. know the rigged OTC *game* ..
summer of 2014 .. OBG's involvement kept longs' frustrations in check
summer of 2015 .. ECO's *promise* kept longs' frustrations in check
summer of 2016 .. RH's *intent* keeps longs' frustrations somewhat in check
the ball is in RH's court .. patience by P2O investors isn't unlimited .. that said
this actual P2O investor (like lots of other actual investors) long ago made
the choice re: PTOI (stock) .. which is why trolls' angst continues to ratchet
(supply/demand)
the tech works .. and everyone with *interest* .. knows it ..
now *change* needs to make its appearance specific to P2O
4kids