Ah, the "mistake" defense for this POS. Now that r
Post# of 7795
Posted On: 06/01/2016 9:23:03 PM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #2360
Ah, the "mistake" defense for this POS. Now that rings a bell........
Why would SFRX file a lawsuit based on any information they didn't know was true, only to regurgitate it over and over in the same complaint?
BTW....you do know Huffman is REQUIRED under the rules to correct any false information told to the Court by his client, don't you?
And did they make a mistake when they claimed they lost contracts (plural) or did someone provide them bad information and is that insignificant?
Further, when is any LIE insignificant?
I recall this........
Quote:
There's not understanding the rules of iHub and there's lying. Two different things. Someone certainly could have told them bad information on the rules. Insignificant either way. Makes no difference.
Why would SFRX file a lawsuit based on any information they didn't know was true, only to regurgitate it over and over in the same complaint?
BTW....you do know Huffman is REQUIRED under the rules to correct any false information told to the Court by his client, don't you?
And did they make a mistake when they claimed they lost contracts (plural) or did someone provide them bad information and is that insignificant?
Further, when is any LIE insignificant?
Quote:
Hey, does Georgia's Hall County Sherrif's Office ring a bell?
I recall this........
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼