Worth another look.....and while we're at it another thought.
Anyone who falls for and posts made up sh*t is weak, fearful and stupid, and is exactly the kind of person who credulously fell for birther nonsense and 'death panels'.
Also the kind of person who sat down on election night '12, perhaps with some like minded, credulous fools, all set to celebrate a Romney win.
In other words a person untethered to reality and heedless of facts and evidence that run contrary to his beliefs and feelings.
The same massively impaired critical thinking skills are now deployed in 'Operation Wash, Rinse and Repeat '16'.
I'm not sayin' that there aren't plenty of asses on this board for you to blow smoke up, I'm just sayin' that's exactly what you're doing!
LOL!
Anyone who falls for and posts made up sh*t is weak, fearful and stupid, and is exactly the kind of person who credulously fell for birther nonsense and 'death panels'.
Also the kind of person who sat down on election night '12, perhaps with some like minded, credulous fools, all set to celebrate a Romney win.
In other words a person untethered to reality and heedless of facts and evidence that run contrary to his beliefs and feelings.
The same massively impaired critical thinking skills are now deployed in 'Operation Wash, Rinse and Repeat '16'.
I'm not sayin' that there aren't plenty of asses on this board for you to blow smoke up, I'm just sayin' that's exactly what you're doing!
LOL!
Quote:RICO Shoddy
A broken Huffington Post link circulating on social media suggested that Hillary Clinton would soon face an indictment, but the article was unvetted and did not list any credible sources.
Kim LaCapria
May 30, 2016
http://www.snopes.com/clinton-federal-racketeering-charges/
WHAT'S TRUE: Frank Huguenaud published an unvetted article on Huffington Post's Contributor platform claiming Hillary Clinton would be indicted on racketeering charges, an article that was soon removed from the site.
WHAT'S FALSE: No one else has reported on anything similar Huguenaud's claims, and his article provided no citations nor any credible information suggesting there was any truth to his claims.
2
