You mean Ihub mods can ban posters as the company
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 06/01/2016 6:33:45 AM
You mean Ihub mods can ban posters as the company stated in the original complaint that you were posting within hours after it was filed with the Court? (no connection to the company, right?)
And SFRX really did lose contracts (plural) even though they admitted they didn't when they finally answered the Interrogatories?
And their Exhibit A presented at the last hearing had posts from the Defendant on the SFRX board?
And the Captain's wife's name was on the silver platters? ( not in Sinclair's research design)
And the company's archaeologist (not Jim Sinclair) found gold coins on the very site? (not in Sinclair's research design)
And the use of the word Koward by the Defendant does irreparable harm to the company and it's shareholders?
And Huffman didn't invite me to the party?
And Kyle and Craig don't have long standing relationships with convicted fraudster Thomas E. Law II?
Law & Associates
Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Office obtained a final judgment against Law & Associates LLC (not a law firm) and Thomas E. Law II for violations of law in the conduct of their Pinellas-county based foreclosure rescue business which offered to assist homeowners in default on their mortgages in saving their homes from foreclosure. These defendants charged homeowners advance fees of approximately $1,590 for services that they misrepresented to consumers were guaranteed to help consumers avoid foreclosure and keep their homes or the consumers would be entitled to their money back. The Attorney General had more than 200 known consumers who had complained of the defendants' failure to provide the services promised, and 125 known consumers who had requested refunds under the money-back guarantee but did not receive a refund. After a trial in this case, the Court found that the defendants engaged in deceptive, unfair and unconscionable practices that resulted in multiple violations of Florida law. The judgment permanently enjoins the defendants from engaging in foreclosure-related rescue services; any business offering financial services to consumers, including loan modification, credit counseling, debt management, loan brokering, debt settlement, or investment management; any business offering real estate services to consumers; and any business that engages in telemarketing. The judgment also requires defendants to pay refunds to consumers amounting to $198,594, a civil penalty of $62,500 for violation of Florida law, and attorneys fees and costs
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/new...1F00703613
https://www.scribd.com/doc/300097945/Thomas-L...t-for-SFRX
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationS...0000683601
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationS...0000683601
Is that what you mean?
And SFRX really did lose contracts (plural) even though they admitted they didn't when they finally answered the Interrogatories?
And their Exhibit A presented at the last hearing had posts from the Defendant on the SFRX board?
And the Captain's wife's name was on the silver platters? ( not in Sinclair's research design)
And the company's archaeologist (not Jim Sinclair) found gold coins on the very site? (not in Sinclair's research design)
And the use of the word Koward by the Defendant does irreparable harm to the company and it's shareholders?
And Huffman didn't invite me to the party?
And Kyle and Craig don't have long standing relationships with convicted fraudster Thomas E. Law II?
Law & Associates
Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Office obtained a final judgment against Law & Associates LLC (not a law firm) and Thomas E. Law II for violations of law in the conduct of their Pinellas-county based foreclosure rescue business which offered to assist homeowners in default on their mortgages in saving their homes from foreclosure. These defendants charged homeowners advance fees of approximately $1,590 for services that they misrepresented to consumers were guaranteed to help consumers avoid foreclosure and keep their homes or the consumers would be entitled to their money back. The Attorney General had more than 200 known consumers who had complained of the defendants' failure to provide the services promised, and 125 known consumers who had requested refunds under the money-back guarantee but did not receive a refund. After a trial in this case, the Court found that the defendants engaged in deceptive, unfair and unconscionable practices that resulted in multiple violations of Florida law. The judgment permanently enjoins the defendants from engaging in foreclosure-related rescue services; any business offering financial services to consumers, including loan modification, credit counseling, debt management, loan brokering, debt settlement, or investment management; any business offering real estate services to consumers; and any business that engages in telemarketing. The judgment also requires defendants to pay refunds to consumers amounting to $198,594, a civil penalty of $62,500 for violation of Florida law, and attorneys fees and costs
http://www.myfloridalegal.com/newsrel.nsf/new...1F00703613
https://www.scribd.com/doc/300097945/Thomas-L...t-for-SFRX
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationS...0000683601
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationS...0000683601
Is that what you mean?
Quote:
You would not know the truth if it slapped you in the face.
(0)
(0)