That's a partial list. You claim I am wrong, and a
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 05/30/2016 12:47:02 PM
That's a partial list. You claim I am wrong, and as I have said before......prove it and I will post a correction and admit being wrong.
I challenge you and the rest of Kyle's sheeple to agree to do the same.
If it's shown there was no such agreement in place with the FBAR concerning "3 items" will you admit it was at the very least deceptive? You know a board poster identified by the company mentioned "3 items" before the company did, don't you?
If it's shown Mary had no such conversation with a lender/investor last September about a permit being ready to go, will you and/or others speak out against that fraudulent activity?
What if there are no pending permits as the company suggest there are?
Come on, be willing to do what I have said I would as the process plays out.
Or at least explain why you won't.
The scales had to be lifted off the Defendant's eyes, and when they were he admitted he was duped and called Kyle out.
Was he suppose to keep holding those worthless shares in order to speak out?
Is that some sort of law that you must own shares to criticize this POS? If so, post a link.
Take the challenge. I dare you. Or will you call it all a "mistake" like you have thus far?
I challenge you and the rest of Kyle's sheeple to agree to do the same.
If it's shown there was no such agreement in place with the FBAR concerning "3 items" will you admit it was at the very least deceptive? You know a board poster identified by the company mentioned "3 items" before the company did, don't you?
If it's shown Mary had no such conversation with a lender/investor last September about a permit being ready to go, will you and/or others speak out against that fraudulent activity?
What if there are no pending permits as the company suggest there are?
Come on, be willing to do what I have said I would as the process plays out.
Or at least explain why you won't.
The scales had to be lifted off the Defendant's eyes, and when they were he admitted he was duped and called Kyle out.
Was he suppose to keep holding those worthless shares in order to speak out?
Is that some sort of law that you must own shares to criticize this POS? If so, post a link.
Take the challenge. I dare you. Or will you call it all a "mistake" like you have thus far?
(2)
(0)