I get it just fine but I think legally speaking, w

I get it just fine but I think legally speaking, what's on HJOE's SM is the same as if it came straight from the CEO. You're saying it's no problem for HJOE to tweet that they had a meeting with a European distributor but Veal isn't allowed to even acknowledge that fact or give shareholders additional details because of a lawsuit? What if they tweet that they now have approval to ship to Europe? That would be ok but Veal saying the same thing in a shareholder letter is not allowed? That just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. But if that is the case that Veal can never provide any details about the business then let's just hope this KBM loan is the only loan left. If another lender decides to sue then we might not hear another word from Veal for years to come.