On the surface, the word 'facilitated' in relation
Post# of 22465
Posted On: 05/23/2016 2:35:22 PM
On the surface, the word 'facilitated' in relation to Kiscos' role in that PR appears to conform to their 'services-offered' wording on their website:
"Kisco’s global network gives you the competitive advantage. We can work with you at your local Kisco facility to develop a process for your parts, then transfer the process to one of our mass production facilities in China. With facilities around the world, we can assist you wherever your needs may be."
*And if Kisco is being utilized in this manner by QMC[?] , it might be interesting to consider what 'products' might come of this...parylene-encased LED lighting perhaps, a solar cell[?], a film[?]...no clue here but the possibility of being able to make use of Kiscos' facilities to manufacture some form of end-user offering might seem attractive if needed.
*On a separate note; In regards to forward guidance , todays PR (if I'm interpreting this correctly) would appear to alter the previously given first-revenues timeline from Q3 or 4 of this year , to Q1 or 2 of next year...conceivably resulting in a timeline of Q2 or Q3 before any quarterly filings show the revenues envisioned. Along with others, I look forward to the day when the word 'samples' is replaced by the word 'revenue'
"Kisco’s global network gives you the competitive advantage. We can work with you at your local Kisco facility to develop a process for your parts, then transfer the process to one of our mass production facilities in China. With facilities around the world, we can assist you wherever your needs may be."
*And if Kisco is being utilized in this manner by QMC[?] , it might be interesting to consider what 'products' might come of this...parylene-encased LED lighting perhaps, a solar cell[?], a film[?]...no clue here but the possibility of being able to make use of Kiscos' facilities to manufacture some form of end-user offering might seem attractive if needed.
*On a separate note; In regards to forward guidance , todays PR (if I'm interpreting this correctly) would appear to alter the previously given first-revenues timeline from Q3 or 4 of this year , to Q1 or 2 of next year...conceivably resulting in a timeline of Q2 or Q3 before any quarterly filings show the revenues envisioned. Along with others, I look forward to the day when the word 'samples' is replaced by the word 'revenue'
(2)
(0)