Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Political Debate Board Message Board

Your point comes from a political position. Try ma

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 65629
Posted On: 05/19/2016 5:06:06 PM
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #9740
Quote:
Your point comes from a political position. Try making a point without a hit piece against Republicans. It is no more valid than a hit piece against Democrats.



First of all, the data from CA and MN are accurate and verifiable.

The FACT that the GOP, and its 'comrades', universally revile the policies enacted by the two governors, that they PREDICTED the exact opposite of what has happened in those two States, implicitly, and correctly condemns those in the GOP who made the 'bad calls'.

The CA article said that "the Republicans were full of crap"...for their 'predictions'. So throw that out if you like. It doesn't change the fact that nobody on the GOP side accurately predicted the results of Gov. Brown's policies.

The MN piece left out the anti-GOP rhetoric and simply pointed out the core economic beliefs of the modern GOP are 'bunk'.

quote]It’s official — trickle-down economics is bunk. Minnesota has proven it once and for all. If you believe otherwise, you are wrong . [/quote]

At some point people arguing for polices that haven't worked need to be called on that, and properly asked why those same polices will work in the future.

You stating my 'point' comes from a 'political position' doesn't mean that the facts don't support that position.

And your arguments are hardly apolitical. I don't waste my time dismissing arguments for their politics rather than for their lack of facts and evidence.

False equivalence is crap.









(1)
(0)








Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us