boiler, I agree on the burden of proof but there i

boiler, I agree on the burden of proof but there is none! In my opinion it's BS until provided proof the accounting firm "took the money and ran". A shareholder class action would bring it out! There continues to be zero answers but many excuses and without knowing better it only points to incompetence or fraud! Let's say there was this good reason and/or the temptation to hire the same accounting firm the old BOD used. I understand that decision because using the same accounting firm provides the continuity of the paper work and experience with past TECO financials. If that accounting firm was owed money for prior work but agreed to work the new financials with new money while waiting on what was owed then it was naïve at best to think that firm was being honest. There isn't an excuse in the world why a CEO would allow an accounting firm to steal shareholder's money. I never bought into any of that share lot being sold for capitol towards the financials. I would be furious if I did and remained in the dark on it's whereabouts without solid proof to back the reasons. I'm furious with TECO for many reasons already and that debacle would only add fuel to the fires.