THAT'S CALLED A RELIABLE NEWS STORY. Nooo, not

Quote:

---

THAT'S CALLED A RELIABLE NEWS STORY.

---

Nooo, not without independent confirmation. It's called hearsay.

And, where is the email release as done with his other victims?

Oh wait, I forgot, The Clinton Foundation sent its 'Tom Hagen' to make an offer that Lazar 'could not refuse' LOL!

Seriously, what part of the emboldened points is not clear to you? What part of all of this is a conservative 'wet dream'?

Quote:

---

In response to Lazar’s claims, the Clinton campaign issued a statement Wednesday night saying, "There is absolutely no basis to believe the claims made by this criminal from his prison cell. In addition to the fact he offers no proof to support his claims, his descriptions of Secretary Clinton's server are inaccurate. It is unfathomable that he would have gained access to her emails and not leaked them the way he did to his other victims.”

In March, the New York Times reported the Clinton server security logs showed no evidence of a breach. On whether the Clinton security logs would show a compromise, Wright made the comparison to a bank heist: "Let’s say only one camera was on in the bank. If you don‘t have them all on, or the right one in the right locations, you won’t see what you are looking for.”

Gourley said the logs may not tell the whole story and the hard drives, three years after the fact, may not have a lot of related data left. He also warned: "Unfortunately, in this community, a lot people make up stories and it's hard to tell what's really true until you get into the forensics information and get hard facts.” [/b]

---