I have alot of confidence in your previous post.
Post# of 11040
Posted On: 05/03/2016 2:38:35 PM
I have alot of confidence in your previous post. Except for one thing...
Seems to be much more extensive then this
Don't forget Cor already settled with Finra in the past and didnt lose their right to conduct future business on activities that were very harmful to the financial system. (Hense their reorganization from Legent to Cor Clearing)
https://www.finra.org/newsroom/2013/finra-fin...y-failures
http://www.whistleblower-defense.com/files/20...ng-LLC.pdf
The list of people in the subpoena did not start out speaking bad and continue to some extent not speak out against Cor. The pattern of behavior among a select few shows the exact difference. Its possible that clients of Cor who also post or are affiliated to posters on Ihub are in full display for the Judge to see the reality of their involvement. The same goes for the relationship that Cor clients have with Alpine who is known to short via their toxic financing actions.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/12145216/1/the...-says.html
Perhaps that same 3rd party who has the authority to negotiate for CRGP wants to look a little deeper. Who is to say the DTCC 's custody services dont allow the protection needed to touch such sensitive entities...
PS.
That 3rd party could be someone defending a DEFENDANT....its happened before.
$CRGP
Seems to be much more extensive then this
Quote:
retaliating against any one who speaks out against COR.
Don't forget Cor already settled with Finra in the past and didnt lose their right to conduct future business on activities that were very harmful to the financial system. (Hense their reorganization from Legent to Cor Clearing)
https://www.finra.org/newsroom/2013/finra-fin...y-failures
http://www.whistleblower-defense.com/files/20...ng-LLC.pdf
The list of people in the subpoena did not start out speaking bad and continue to some extent not speak out against Cor. The pattern of behavior among a select few shows the exact difference. Its possible that clients of Cor who also post or are affiliated to posters on Ihub are in full display for the Judge to see the reality of their involvement. The same goes for the relationship that Cor clients have with Alpine who is known to short via their toxic financing actions.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/12145216/1/the...-says.html
Perhaps that same 3rd party who has the authority to negotiate for CRGP wants to look a little deeper. Who is to say the DTCC 's custody services dont allow the protection needed to touch such sensitive entities...
PS.
That 3rd party could be someone defending a DEFENDANT....its happened before.
$CRGP
(3)
(0)Calissio Resources Group, Inc. (CRGP) Stock Research Links
U.S. Constitution
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/