$TPAC That is an excellent question, and one I do

$TPAC That is an excellent question, and one I don't have a definitive answer to. One guess is that in the case that they don't issue shares for compensation or expansion, the 20% set aside from funding diminishes and affects the balance sheet, and potential for further lending that may require a free flow of cash alongside a stream of revenue(licensing, etc). If the shares can be issued, then repurchased by an entity that will turn the money invested into more money by holding the shares long enough to turn them over at a higher price, it may serve to be a vehicle to self-fund the operation so that dilution becomes net-zero for the shareholders while being exponentially more profitable for the company/FR. While I need to make it clear that I do not know for certain and am just speculating, that would be my best guess.

Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.