Kyle Kennedy LIES in open court 4-7-16 about the D
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 04/27/2016 10:30:24 AM
Kyle Kennedy LIES in open court 4-7-16 about the Defendant's postings.
See page 48 beginning on line 7 here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/309769190/4-7-16-S...ne-Hearing
Kyle the Koward Kennedy and Huffman wanted the Defendant thrown in jail for exercising his First Amendment rights. Those two are real a POS.
7 Q. All right. And are those postings then -- do
8 those postings reveal any information that is prejudicial to
9 the company and untrue -- that you see?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Can you give me an example.
12 A. Sure.
13 Q. And, if you could, read us the date.
14 A. This is an example. Here's one on 7.19. it's the
15 one in front of me.
16 Q. 7.19 of what year?
17 A. 7.19.2015. It says, "I held the stock and other
18 "scammy, trashy, so called cover stocks before and
19 "they all lost value. Because unknown to shareholders,
20 "they were meant to be scammy from the beginning.
21 "E-A-H" and then "O-R-V." I don't know what that
22 means. "More ammo for their evil master." That was in
23 reflection to me. "But remember, some ducks were
24 "never meant to fly. But this one is real. Glad to
25 "be part of it."
1 THE COURT: What in there, in your estimation, has
2 referred it to your company? None of the part you read
3 did.
4 THE WITNESS: This all these posts are posted
5 under Seafarer Explorations post.
6 THE COURT: I see, they're -- they're in the
7 group.
SFRX's own Exhibit A shows that posts to be on another stock board. See page 6 here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/309891985/Exhibit-...-Volentine
Here's a link to the actual post Kyle LIED about when the Judge asked what it had to do with SFRX.
See page 48 beginning on line 7 here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/309769190/4-7-16-S...ne-Hearing
Kyle the Koward Kennedy and Huffman wanted the Defendant thrown in jail for exercising his First Amendment rights. Those two are real a POS.
7 Q. All right. And are those postings then -- do
8 those postings reveal any information that is prejudicial to
9 the company and untrue -- that you see?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Can you give me an example.
12 A. Sure.
13 Q. And, if you could, read us the date.
14 A. This is an example. Here's one on 7.19. it's the
15 one in front of me.
16 Q. 7.19 of what year?
17 A. 7.19.2015. It says, "I held the stock and other
18 "scammy, trashy, so called cover stocks before and
19 "they all lost value. Because unknown to shareholders,
20 "they were meant to be scammy from the beginning.
21 "E-A-H" and then "O-R-V." I don't know what that
22 means. "More ammo for their evil master." That was in
23 reflection to me. "But remember, some ducks were
24 "never meant to fly. But this one is real. Glad to
25 "be part of it."
1 THE COURT: What in there, in your estimation, has
2 referred it to your company? None of the part you read
3 did.
4 THE WITNESS: This all these posts are posted
5 under Seafarer Explorations post.
6 THE COURT: I see, they're -- they're in the
7 group.
SFRX's own Exhibit A shows that posts to be on another stock board. See page 6 here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/309891985/Exhibit-...-Volentine
Here's a link to the actual post Kyle LIED about when the Judge asked what it had to do with SFRX.
(1)
(0)