Another vehicle? Would Projen be too simple of an answer? I, also have to agree speaking of hub is just clutter on this board and I'll add that reposting tweets may be as well. Would I be foolish to think we all don't read them already? By the way, I believe it's business at 10/ finance at 2. As for I hub, one message board reaches out to far fewer investors then a .01 pps does. Think about how many less it influences at .10! I love the dd and conversation on this board but it's time to put the cart back behind the horse. Here is my take. 1. I think the 5 mil everyone says Bill "tossed" in might be an asset total. Including the acquisition of Godfrey. Plus everything tpac has acquired along the way. As per the assessment that tpac had nothing from ir. 2. A company wouldn't seek out an ir, a 50 mil loan or restructure management if it was going downhill. 3. Obviously, Boeing is part of the big picture, if you can't read the signs you might wanna head for Vegas and put your money on a card table! 4. As for the 250k or less you won't hear about strategy... I'm thinking, don't waste my time, merely a rain drop in a hurricane.5. I had no issues with corvair posts but didn't see the ones that got deleted, seemed to me he/she was feeling skeptical about there investment. No reason to chase them away. Sometimes, too much positive can become negative. Just my thoughts. Tell me if you disagree, I lost my feelings when I was teenager, so you can't hurt me on a message board. Bottom line, ir says .01 by eoy. Fact! No funds yet. If you were dealing in facts, wouldn't you not assume? Obviously there is something in place to create revenue. Fact! If and when we are approved, .01 will be in the rear view! Conservative? If everything falls into place this could be the biggest underestimation any of us will see in a lifetime! FACT!
(10)
(0)
Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links