Let's consider why management has been hushed in g

Let's consider why management has been hushed in general lately and for a time period that is obviously uncomfortable to long shareholders. If we are not cynical in assuming the lack of info is for a selfish reason, we are left to consider that maybe the lack of transparency is actually strategic. First off, why be cynical? It isn't good for your health. Well there may be a couple of reasons to make cynicism tempting in this case, but nothing other than speculation, gossip and hearsay. Since I'm not a cynic in life, I'm left pondering why the silence is strategic. There has not been an RS, wasn't that mentioned by a person no longer with the company anyway? If I consider that the RS was intended to be announced but never actually occur, what would be a good strategic reason for that? Could it be considered a good idea and a benefit to the shareholders to spin the idea that the company is in peril while it is actually raking in revenue hand over fist? I am a strong buy. NTEK all the way!