"scie is climbing back up"...okay, thats your quote. got it. if you want to argue semantics, i'm game. okay, had you made that statement a few weeks ago you would have been correct, however its been on a sustained slide for several weeks. you'd be more correct to say the current trend for scie is sliding downward and not "climbing back up". again, its semantics and its a silly game.
i look at the chart and scie was lifeless for a while, and then there was a pump that apparently you aren't privy to as your circles and mine do not overlap, investors jumped on board on the "suggestion" that this stock is going to be huge, new money came in, created a bump, and then opportunistic investors cut and ran. and now its headed for more of that flat-line EKG looking chart with no pulse. for how long it stays there i have no idea. i want you to be right and me to be wrong, for what its worth.
no, i'm not trying to dump this. is it okay to ask questions here and express disappointment without being accused of dumping? sheez.
on a google search of "optical biopsies", lots of competitors products appear long before the one listing of the wavestat4 article is found, and its noteworthy that there is no date on the wavestat article. nod goes to competitors.
though i appreciate the research you do on SCIE, it comes across to me as the sort of research that an investor does to make himself feel good about his investment. a different approach might be to research the competitors, identify who they are, what their stock and sales look like, and why their stock and technology wouldn't be a better investment going into the future for optical biopsies. maybe you've done that and i haven't read it yet. i do not read all your posts. only some of them.
i look at the chart and scie was lifeless for a while, and then there was a pump that apparently you aren't privy to as your circles and mine do not overlap, investors jumped on board on the "suggestion" that this stock is going to be huge, new money came in, created a bump, and then opportunistic investors cut and ran. and now its headed for more of that flat-line EKG looking chart with no pulse. for how long it stays there i have no idea. i want you to be right and me to be wrong, for what its worth.
no, i'm not trying to dump this. is it okay to ask questions here and express disappointment without being accused of dumping? sheez.
on a google search of "optical biopsies", lots of competitors products appear long before the one listing of the wavestat4 article is found, and its noteworthy that there is no date on the wavestat article. nod goes to competitors.
though i appreciate the research you do on SCIE, it comes across to me as the sort of research that an investor does to make himself feel good about his investment. a different approach might be to research the competitors, identify who they are, what their stock and sales look like, and why their stock and technology wouldn't be a better investment going into the future for optical biopsies. maybe you've done that and i haven't read it yet. i do not read all your posts. only some of them.
