I've been asked privately about why this post 6815
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 04/25/2016 8:08:45 PM
Re: 1965corvair #6819
I've been asked privately about why this post 6815 was removed corvair. I don't know why any mod here might have removed it but don't recall seeing any reason for its removal as it was just a basic question about any potential RS. Think it's fine for anyone to question this matter... as it has been questioned in the past and it also has been addressed by IR of TPAC on Twitter. They very definitively said no RS in 2016. Even saying not within 45-90 days doesn't say an RS would take place.
I personally believe no company would do an RS unless it's uplisting and needs to bring up the pps but also know that if the business can support the stock, as I suspect with the potential ahead for TPAC seems to be at this point, uplisting may be done without an RS at all.... and this of course is yet to be seen and would be a while before I would expect any of that. In fact, I've been told it would be 15-18 months from this past January IF (big if) an RS is required.
It's possible IR didn't respond to you because the matter's been addressed but you'll have another chance to ask tomorrow.
I personally believe no company would do an RS unless it's uplisting and needs to bring up the pps but also know that if the business can support the stock, as I suspect with the potential ahead for TPAC seems to be at this point, uplisting may be done without an RS at all.... and this of course is yet to be seen and would be a while before I would expect any of that. In fact, I've been told it would be 15-18 months from this past January IF (big if) an RS is required.
It's possible IR didn't respond to you because the matter's been addressed but you'll have another chance to ask tomorrow.
(2)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼