Cheney could not have sold it without the 911 fals
Post# of 65629
Quote:
Cheney could not have sold it without the 911 false flag. And don't sight that popular mechanic garbage again.
As you can read the list is long and persuasive, 'False flag' appears nowhere on the list because there was no false flag.
Calling the PM debunking of 9/11 conspiracy theories garbage does not remotely make it so.
The PM article is replete with science, aviation and engineering experts who conclude that what conspiracy theorists like yourself believe is....garbage.
But hey, let intelligent, non-critical thinking impaired people draw their own conclusions. Here, I've cited it again:
:http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a2043/4220721/
Back to our originally scheduled program:
Lie by Lie: A Timeline of How We Got Into Iraq
Mushroom clouds, duct tape, Judy Miller, Curveball. Recalling how Americans were sold a bogus case for invasion.
—By Jonathan Stein and Tim Dickinson
| September/October 2006 Issue
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/l...r-timeline
Quote:
At A congressional hearing examining the march to war in Iraq, Republican congressman Walter Jones posed "a very simple question" about the administration's manipulation of intelligence: "How could the professionals see what was happening and nobody speak out?"
Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, responded with an equally simple answer: "The vice president."
But the blame for Iraq does not end with Cheney, Bush, or Rumsfeld. Nor is it limited to the intelligence operatives who sat silent as the administration cherry-picked its case for war, or with those, like Colin Powell or Hans Blix, who, in the name of loyalty or statesmanship, did not give full throat to their misgivings. It is also shared by far too many in the Fourth Estate, most notably the New York Times' Judith Miller.
But let us not forget that it lies, inescapably, with we the American people, who, in our fear and rage over the catastrophic events of September 11, 2001, allowed ourselves to be suckered into the most audacious bait and switch of all time.
The first drafts of history are, by their nature, fragmentary. They arrive tragically late, and too often out of order. Back in 2006, we attempted to strip the history of the runup to the war to its bones, to reconstruct a skeleton that we thought might be key in resolving the open questions of the Bush era.
As we prepare to leave Iraq, we present that timeline to you again. MotherJones.com offers a greatly expanded (if now technologically outdated) version of this timeline, one that is completely sourced to primary documents and initial news accounts. It was our hope to make this second draft of history as definitive as possible. So that we won't be fooled again.—THE EDITORS
Quote:
9/12/01 According to counterterror czar Richard Clarke, "[Bush] told us, 'I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this.'" Told evidence against Al Qaeda overwhelming, Bush asks for "any shred" Saddam was involved. [Date the public knew: 3/22/04]