Further proof Kyle LIED from SFRX's own filing wit
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 04/20/2016 7:47:45 PM
Further proof Kyle LIED from SFRX's own filing with the Court. To be specific, Kyle the Koward Kennedy said this in open court in the 4/7/16 hearing. See page 48 line 11 and this goes into page 49 line 5.
11 Q. Can you give me an example.
12 A. Sure.
13 Q. And, if you could, read us the date.
14 A. This is an example. Here's one on 7.19. it's the
15 one in front of me.
16 Q. 7.19 of what year?
17 A. 7.19.2015. It says, "I held the stock and other
18 "scammy, trashy, so called cover stocks before and
19 "they all lost value. Because unknown to shareholders,
20 "they were meant to be scammy from the beginning.
21 "E-A-H" and then "O-R-V." I don't know what that
22 means. "More ammo for their evil master." That was in
23 reflection to me. "But remember, some ducks were
24 "never meant to fly. But this one is real. Glad to
25 "be part of it."
1 THE COURT: What in there, in your estimation, has
2 referred it to your company? None of the part you read
3 did.
4 THE WITNESS: This all these posts are posted
5 under Seafarer Explorations post.
Anyone can check page 48 and 49 here and see this is Kyle the Koward Kennedy's own words here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/309769190/4-7-16-S...ne-Hearing
Now let's look at Exhibit "A" filed by SFRX claiming the Defendant violated the Injunction. SFRX shows this to be posted on the EXPL board, not the SFRX board. Yet we are reading claims the posts may have been deleted. A check of the facts shows it wasn't, but the facts never seem to get in the way of the faithful.
Exhibit "A". See page 6 here ; https://www.scribd.com/doc/309891985/Exhibit-...-Volentine
Here's the link to the post, which is NOT on the SFRX board and has not been deleted, even though it's been suggested it has.
11 Q. Can you give me an example.
12 A. Sure.
13 Q. And, if you could, read us the date.
14 A. This is an example. Here's one on 7.19. it's the
15 one in front of me.
16 Q. 7.19 of what year?
17 A. 7.19.2015. It says, "I held the stock and other
18 "scammy, trashy, so called cover stocks before and
19 "they all lost value. Because unknown to shareholders,
20 "they were meant to be scammy from the beginning.
21 "E-A-H" and then "O-R-V." I don't know what that
22 means. "More ammo for their evil master." That was in
23 reflection to me. "But remember, some ducks were
24 "never meant to fly. But this one is real. Glad to
25 "be part of it."
1 THE COURT: What in there, in your estimation, has
2 referred it to your company? None of the part you read
3 did.
4 THE WITNESS: This all these posts are posted
5 under Seafarer Explorations post.
Anyone can check page 48 and 49 here and see this is Kyle the Koward Kennedy's own words here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/309769190/4-7-16-S...ne-Hearing
Now let's look at Exhibit "A" filed by SFRX claiming the Defendant violated the Injunction. SFRX shows this to be posted on the EXPL board, not the SFRX board. Yet we are reading claims the posts may have been deleted. A check of the facts shows it wasn't, but the facts never seem to get in the way of the faithful.
Exhibit "A". See page 6 here ; https://www.scribd.com/doc/309891985/Exhibit-...-Volentine
Here's the link to the post, which is NOT on the SFRX board and has not been deleted, even though it's been suggested it has.
(2)
(1)