$TPAC Thanks, M3. I don't think anything has cha

$TPAC Thanks, M3. I don't think anything has changed here. When the SS debacle hit, the float was exactly what we expected(and were told) it was, despite the O/S being off. People panicked. Not only was the float accurate, the number of shares retired were also correct. The only thing that I see as being a bit off point, or at least lost in translation between the company and its shareholders, is the time bridging the announcement of events and the completion of events. I believe that that is what is causing the selling. I have to admit to thinking that things would transpire sooner as well. Rare is it to see timelines get hit with pinpoint accuracy in pennies. Delays seem par for the course, by weeks or months, when trading OTC. Regardless, I am not worried. I asked myself a couple of questions: 1) Has anything changed here from a fundamental perspective that could be unquestionably negative and detrimental to the company? 2) If the stock went from .0006-.0072, why should I assume it is not going to return to .0072 because we are at .0018? My answer to question #1 was "No, quite the opposite.", and my answer to #2 was "I shouldn't make such an assumption." I am now waiting for a bottom to get the most bang for the buck. Between my last post(earlier today) and this post, I have been to the bank and then to my brokerage. Funds should be clear tonight. Once it bottoms, I'm adding.

Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.