Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Political Debate Board Message Board

and you have no argument. To simply allow purchas

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 65629
Posted On: 04/14/2016 1:22:04 PM
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #7427
Quote:
and you have no argument. To simply allow purchasing healthcare across state lines and allow preexisting conditions would have solved all. i do not need prenatal care or birth control so why the f' do I have it?...as well as my son. I have full right to bitch and complain because it has directly effected me. I have yet to see someone in this forum state where it has helped them personally.



I do have an argument and I've made it repeatedly. I gave you my 'personal' stories last night. An In-law and two close friends, and I sure the f*ck don't need to go into more particulars to satisfy you or anyone else on the board. What, I have to get sick to have a credible 'story'? F.O. on that.

Your description about 'what would have solved all' is ludicrous. States with the most lax Insurance regulations would have monopolized the sign-ups. that was the argument against doing it.

You left out no lifetime limits on coverage. and of course the only way the insurance companies would agree to the pre-existing condition reform was because of an influx of new customers, guaranteed by....the individual mandate.

Use your head on that, a larger f*cking pool with a larger mix of young and healthy. Same principle as SS contributions VS payouts.

You can rely on personal experience to represent most of the 10's of millions of experiences that differ from yours all you like.

I choose to go with 'wider samples' than personal experience recounted on a political board.

As for whether or not your 'conservative'? The side you've come down on RE most posts contradicts that claim, comrade.


(1)
(0)








Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us