Sincerely sorry that some of you have, according to your posts, 'fallen through the cracks' when it comes to the ACA.
As I've repeatedly posted, there were winners and losers in health care coverage, not to mention in outcomes, BEFORE the ACA.
You can continue to pretend that your own experiences, as painful as they are, are the rule for the nation, and that any claims to the contrary are not true, but the evidence doesn't support those claims.
What is also irrefutable is that ACA mandated changes include — among other things — enrolling and not discriminating against people with pre-existing conditions, covering preventive care and not being able to discontinue coverage due to illness or reaching a lifetime maximum. Additionally the Medicare D 'donut hole' shrinks every year on the way to elimination by 2020.
Also: If your insurance company spends more than 20% (15% in large markets) of premium dollars on expenses other than health care costs they will have to send out rebates for the difference. You may see the rebate in a number of ways:
•A rebate check in the mail
•A lump-sum deposit into the same account that was used to pay the premium, if you paid by credit card or debit card
•A direct reduction in your future premium
•Your employer may also use one of the above rebate methods, or apply the rebate in a way that benefits employees
None of that was part of the pre-ACA health care insurance market.
As I've repeatedly posted, there were winners and losers in health care coverage, not to mention in outcomes, BEFORE the ACA.
You can continue to pretend that your own experiences, as painful as they are, are the rule for the nation, and that any claims to the contrary are not true, but the evidence doesn't support those claims.
What is also irrefutable is that ACA mandated changes include — among other things — enrolling and not discriminating against people with pre-existing conditions, covering preventive care and not being able to discontinue coverage due to illness or reaching a lifetime maximum. Additionally the Medicare D 'donut hole' shrinks every year on the way to elimination by 2020.
Also: If your insurance company spends more than 20% (15% in large markets) of premium dollars on expenses other than health care costs they will have to send out rebates for the difference. You may see the rebate in a number of ways:
•A rebate check in the mail
•A lump-sum deposit into the same account that was used to pay the premium, if you paid by credit card or debit card
•A direct reduction in your future premium
•Your employer may also use one of the above rebate methods, or apply the rebate in a way that benefits employees
None of that was part of the pre-ACA health care insurance market.
Quote:Here’s some more good news about Obamacare. Too bad it won’t dent the debate.
By Paul Waldman July 28, 2015
Whenever a health insurer announces that it will be requesting significant premium increases in the coming year, it’s guaranteed to generate news stories that are waved triumphantly by conservatives as proof that the Affordable Care Act is a failure and, just as they predicted, premiums are skyrocketing because the government is messing around in health care.
When a story like this one comes along, on the other hand, it seems to generate much less attention:
California’s Obamacare exchange negotiated a 4% average rate increase for the second year in a row, defying dire predictions about health insurance sticker shock across the country.
The modest price increases for 2016 may be welcome news for many of the 1.3 million Californians who buy individual policies through the state marketplace, known as Covered California.
California’s rates are a key barometer of how the Affordable Care Act is working nationwide, and the results indicate that industry giants Anthem and Kaiser Permanente are eager to compete for customers in the nation’s biggest Obamacare market.
Leading up to Monday’s announcement there had been a steady drumbeat of news about major insurers outside California seeking hefty rate hikes of 20% to 40% for Obamacare open enrollment this fall.
Keep in mind that before the ACA went into effect, annual premium increases of 10 percent or so had become the norm. California is only one state, and when you go across the country the picture is complicated — in some states premiums are rising more slowly than they did before the law; in other states they’ve jumped; and in some places they’ve declined. There are many reasons why. But what’s important to understand is that the predictions of the law’s critics — that both overall health spending and premiums would explode — were completely wrong.
The key word in this story comes in the first paragraph: “negotiated.” California is one of the states where officials running the health care exchange negotiate with insurers over rates, and when you have a negotiation, you can get better terms for the people you represent. Yet incredibly, we’re still arguing over whether what the health insurance market needs is less government involvement and more of that free market magic.
So for the millionth time: the reason we have the world’s most expensive health care system is precisely because the free market failed.
If conservatives were right and government is the problem, then in all the world’s other advanced nations, where there is much more government regulation of health care than we have, they’d be paying more for their health care than we do. But they spend far less, often with better health outcomes and usually with virtually no uninsured.
And after watching this debate for the better part of a decade,
I’ve yet to hear a single conservative explain why that’s the case, and how it squares with their beliefs about government and markets.
How can it possibly be that government-heavy systems — whether you’re talking about a completely socialized one like Great Britain’s or a system like France’s that combines a basic government plan with heavily regulated private supplemental insurance — work so much better and cost so much less than ours?
If you have a religious belief that markets are always right and government is always wrong, it’s just impossible to reconcile.
The point isn’t that the ACA is a perfect piece of legislation that has solved all our problems, because it isn’t and it hasn’t. The ACA is a gigantic kludge layered on top of what was already a terribly dysfunctional system.
Health insurance in America remains incredibly complicated — for instance, if you’re on an exchange, in order to get the best rate you may have to shop around every year.
Unfortunately, Republicans have made it impossible to fix the law’s weaknesses as we used to do with complex legislation, because they’ve fed their constituents a lie that any day now they’re going to repeal the whole thing, so there’s no point in trying to make it work better (and that doing so would be a compromise with evil, of course).
Fifty years ago this Thursday, Lyndon Johnson signed Medicare into law. At the time, Republicans predicted not only that the program would be a failure, but that it would send America hurtling toward a socialist nightmare of oppression.
Ronald Reagan famously said that if the law passed, “we are going to spend our sunset years telling our children, and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.”
Yet this big-government, single-payer health insurance program for seniors turned out to be one of the most successful and popular pieces of legislation in American history.
Not only that, due in part to the Affordable Care Act, the projected future cost of Medicare keeps going down — another conservative prediction about the ACA that has proven wrong by 180 degrees.
1
