$TPAC You pretty much answered the question you had within your reply. It would be based on acquisitions and further purchase orders by new clients of TPAC's and new/existing clients belonging to the company, or companies, acquired. I am not sure as to whether or not Boeing was factored in to the first year's revs, so that may or may not serve as an added bonus. The JV with AVIC, I would believe, would be factored in. And given the size and scope of AVIC, in conjunction with other purchasers, 4M in revs does not seem far fetched. Also, with the near-sideways price movement, holding a pattern on the basis of 100k in revs, should revs show even half of the first year's projections, the market will respond accordingly, which as I mentioned, would be the good things to come. Should we land one or more acquisitions, continue to reduce the SS, land Boeing(and thus the JV with AVIC), have success with the marketing firm throughout Australia, Asia, and the Middle East, alongside a few assorted deals in the US and elsewhere, doing even half of the 4M, just to err on the conservative side, would be very doable. In the end, time will tell, as none of us know and we are resigned to probability and best guesses.
(2)
(0)
Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Do your own DD. Assume everyone here is either an amateur trader/investor or a paid interest such as a compensated pumper/basher. My posts are strictly for entertainment purposes. I am not on Wall St., do not work for a group, and only get paid when my personal investments materialize. I am only responsible for my own gains and losses; no one is to blame for my mistakes or for any advice taken from postings; likewise, I am not to blame for any advice you take of mine, regardless of gains or losses from doing so. Good luck to all; may you live long and prosper greatly.