Deleted from our favorite SMB...lol onehundre
Post# of 4425
Posted On: 04/08/2016 6:02:43 PM
Deleted from our favorite SMB...lol
onehundredmph Thursday, 04/07/16 05:25:54 PM
Re: Wishful Thinking post# 182644
Post # 182649 of 182654
It seems to me there are people purposefully confusing others on how the reverse merger process is suppose to take place. With that said, current litigation dealing with civil matters and criminal matters are separate however share structure is a critical part that is in question because they are needed for the merger process to complete on the Federal Level. The State level clearly shows on paper that Oak River owns the TDEY shell. But Oak River has not received the agreed TDEY shell shares needed to create the new public company in the market. Details in one complaint are spun and combined thru speculation of other complaints not even proved to exist.
I have the feeling that Kent took the litigation route because he had no choice especially considering the process of creating the new public entity in the market would require FINRA (corporate actions check) and the SEC when a new registration statement (Form 10) is filed for approval in the FEDERAL system.
I also have the feeling that EV has held onto shares that he does not own anymore and Kent took him to court because he is a thief and didn't respect the purchase agreement of such shares.
I also have the feeling that there are unauthorized shares in question via the history of the TDEY shell under EV. If I'm correct than there is a high probability that the FBI is involved and Kent really cant comment on anything until he gets the green light from a federal judge. That means pretty much everything related to Oak River Technology and TDEY can not be discussed unless its public knowledge via court record or previous financials.
$TDEY
$ORTC
onehundredmph Thursday, 04/07/16 05:25:54 PM
Re: Wishful Thinking post# 182644
Post # 182649 of 182654
It seems to me there are people purposefully confusing others on how the reverse merger process is suppose to take place. With that said, current litigation dealing with civil matters and criminal matters are separate however share structure is a critical part that is in question because they are needed for the merger process to complete on the Federal Level. The State level clearly shows on paper that Oak River owns the TDEY shell. But Oak River has not received the agreed TDEY shell shares needed to create the new public company in the market. Details in one complaint are spun and combined thru speculation of other complaints not even proved to exist.
I have the feeling that Kent took the litigation route because he had no choice especially considering the process of creating the new public entity in the market would require FINRA (corporate actions check) and the SEC when a new registration statement (Form 10) is filed for approval in the FEDERAL system.
I also have the feeling that EV has held onto shares that he does not own anymore and Kent took him to court because he is a thief and didn't respect the purchase agreement of such shares.
I also have the feeling that there are unauthorized shares in question via the history of the TDEY shell under EV. If I'm correct than there is a high probability that the FBI is involved and Kent really cant comment on anything until he gets the green light from a federal judge. That means pretty much everything related to Oak River Technology and TDEY can not be discussed unless its public knowledge via court record or previous financials.
$TDEY
$ORTC
(3)
(0)STELLA DIAGNOSTICS INC. (SLDX) Stock Research Links
U.S. Constitution
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
"The Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Oath
"I solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America"
The Flag
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Quote:
If the broker-dealer fails to deliver for 13 days, the regulation imposes a “close out” duty to purchase and deliver securities “of like kind and quantity.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/20...ify%20wall
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/m...v-manning/
Scroll down for more posts ▼