Let the company decide? If over $10MM in damage wa
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 04/06/2016 9:09:48 AM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #1976
Let the company decide? If over $10MM in damage was done, you don't think an auditor would pick that up?
SFRX claims to be vetted by the SEC, or at least that's what they told the Court. But it seems a bit absurd to claim damages not reflected in audited numbers. There's not even a note about the Defendant explaining his "alleged" damage to the company. And Huffman suggest a Court found him liable and a judgment was issued.
Now for the last time Kyle doesn't have to sell one share for this to be a pump and dump. He gets his perks, and he's made false statements. But there is plenty of dumping. I recall that about 2/3 of the shares i/o in the last 10K were free trading.
And for some reason they want to keep those ClearTrust docs real close to the vest. They even suggested they were available for inspection at the 12/1 hearing which is beyond absurd. Just one issuance could be 15 pages of documents.
Looking forward to tomorrow.
SFRX claims to be vetted by the SEC, or at least that's what they told the Court. But it seems a bit absurd to claim damages not reflected in audited numbers. There's not even a note about the Defendant explaining his "alleged" damage to the company. And Huffman suggest a Court found him liable and a judgment was issued.
Now for the last time Kyle doesn't have to sell one share for this to be a pump and dump. He gets his perks, and he's made false statements. But there is plenty of dumping. I recall that about 2/3 of the shares i/o in the last 10K were free trading.
And for some reason they want to keep those ClearTrust docs real close to the vest. They even suggested they were available for inspection at the 12/1 hearing which is beyond absurd. Just one issuance could be 15 pages of documents.
Looking forward to tomorrow.
(1)
(0)