Exactly what I was talking about, Convict. What

Exactly what I was talking about, Convict.

What you are saying is not the argument Volentine was making. Both attorneys have said no loans like these were made to related parties or individuals that would have been necessary for a pump and dump.

Your whole point is that they are running a pump and dump. That is not how you run a P&D and you know it (being a P&D artist) but you are trying to make it sound like the two are related and Kyle is handing out these loans to family members and friends. Then you try to defend it by claiming they said none of these loans are taking place at all. Then you call them liars in that one said yes and one said no when they both said the same thing. Twisting words to your favor again, like you do.

It looks to me like Kyle was taking on these loans with the expectation that the company would find treasure before the loans came due and maybe a payoff of the loan could have negated the need for share distribution. Either way, not a sign of a P&D.

And why hasn't Kyle converted any of his shares? Isn't that how P&Ds work?

You have no argument here. The facts are not on your side. This is going to end very badly for you.